
Posts Tagged ‘Antisemitism’
Anti Whites like to say
Wednesday, August 29th, 2012Black Mobs Now Beating Jews in New York
Wednesday, July 4th, 2012If Chaim Amalek had his way, no one would know that mobs of black people are attacking and beating and robbing Jews in the New York area.
Or that they shout anti-Semitic epithets.
Or that they target Jews because “they don’t fight back.”
“Such information can only serve to heighten racial tensions between these two groups,” said Amalek, an alias for New York video blogger Luke Ford. “Let us all look beyond the issue of race (in any event a mere social construct) and instead celebrate our diversity.”
In this case, the New York Post saw a pattern that most other media outlets never see. To some, it was jarring.
“Anti-Jewish crime wave,” read the June headline about a series of recent anti-Semitic attacks. “In the most disturbing incident, a mob of six black teenagers shouting, ‘Dirty Jew!’ and ‘Dirty kike!’ repeatedly bashed Marc Heinberg, 61, as he walked home from temple in Sheepshead Bay (in June.)”
This is one of several black mob attacks on—and robberies of—Jewish people in Brooklyn over the last two years, leaving broken bones and life-threatening injuries in their wake.
The assaults are part of a larger pattern in the New York area and around the country: Black mobs assaulting, robbing, destroying property and creating mayhem—hundreds of times in more than 60 cities.
In February, four black people beat and robbed an Orthodox Jew in the New York suburb of Monsey. They were charged with hate crimes after it was determined they targeted the victim based on his religion. {snip}
Ford and others, such as MSNBC news anchor Melissa Harris-Perry, say the media should not report news if it makes black people look bad. But most racial crimes and violence from black mobs in the New York area are usually not reported—not by the mainstream media anyway.
Many of the commenters said the story should have identified the race of the miscreants—if only to protect the community from future mayhem. That was too much for “brooklynborn,” who said, “I am embarrassed for my fellow Americans who flaunt their racism so publicly. What they did was offensive, but the conditions of where we
On Staten Island in December, two police officers were hurt trying to control a mob of 50 black people attacking a single family home. Firefighters finally disbursed the crowd with fire hoses to get them away from the officers. Several pictures and videos show some of the action.
In May of 2011, more than two dozen black people on a “rampage … terrorized” a Dunkin Donuts. The “swarm mob” attacked patrons, destroyed the fixtures and stole food, reported the Daily Mail, which published the story with pictures.
Last summer, a Bronx man said he was taunted for being white and beaten by a black mob on a subway. No charges were filed, and police refused to list it as a hate crime.
When anti-Zionism becomes anti-Semitism
Thursday, May 24th, 2012There’s no doubt that the majority of the Netanyahu administration’s policies with respect to the Palestinians in their midst are unconscionable. But to effectively attack the Israeli government, the mainstream media in this country – and the left-leaning media in the West – need to be consistent. Unfortunately, the media’s double standards sometimes smack of the very racism of which they accuse others.
When does anti-Zionism count as anti-Semitism? The question has been eating at me these last two weeks, mostly because of the responses to an article I published in the Mail & Guardian
entitled “Who will shake SA Jewry’s faith in Israel?” My line in the piece, which appeared on 7 May, was twofold.
First, I argued that from 1948 until 1994, the semi-official bodies representing the Jewish community in South Africa had been consistently mute on the apartheid question, and that this moral failure went a long way towards explaining their unwavering muteness with respect to the policies of the Netanyahu administration in the occupied territories.
Second, I argued that when Israeli fighter jets fly over Auschwitz on Holocaust Memorial Day, there’s nobody in the local community shouting loud enough that what’s being celebrated is in fact the opposite of victimhood – that Jews are no longer persecuted, that we can no longer look for justification of Israel’s actions to a devastating, pre-1945 past.
As I knew it would, the article drew heavy criticism from the Jewish mainstream in South Africa. An entire editorial was dedicated to my heresies in the SA Jewish Report, and the M&G ran a weak rebuttal from the associate director of the Jewish Board of Deputies, who called my claims “distasteful” and “a clever sleight of hand”.
There was also a response from the editor of a newspaper in Israel, who, after insisting from afar that South African Jews are not “monolithically Pavlovian defenders of Israel”, went on to make the following statement: “And if it seems to Bloom that many South Africans defend Israel’s positions ‘right or wrong,’ it may have something to do with the conversely monolithic approbation Israel receives in the South African press, civil society and government, no matter what Israel does – ‘right or wrong’.”
At the risk of getting caught in the same web of non sequiturs in which the Israeli editor (his name is Amir Mizroch) seems to have landed himself, he was way off beam, although for valid reasons. Where he was mistaken was in his suggestion that I said “all” South African Jews defend Israel “right or wrong” (I didn’t, I said most of them do, as indicated by his use of the word “many”). Where he was on more solid ground was in his assertion that the South African media are developing an indiscriminate Israel-bashing habit.
For instance, this week the Mail & Guardian republished an article that appeared in the UK Guardian of 20 May, which in the tenor of its title alone veered uncomfortably close to the anti-Semitic. “Israel PM: illegal African immigrants threaten identity of Jewish state,” screamed the Guardian header, as if Britain and the rest of the enlightened world welcome illegal immigrants with open arms.
To the Mail & Guardian’s credit, they ran the article under a different header – “Netanyahu: African refugees threaten Israel’s identity, security” – hopefully because a smart editor recognised that the conflation of “illegal immigrants” and “Jewish” in the same context was a bit much. But whatever the M&G’s reasons for toning down the headline, the body of the piece was identical, and was so full of obvious prejudices as to be open to litigation.
“The Israeli prime minister has stoked a volatile debate about refugees and migrant workers from Africa,” the piece began, “warning that ‘illegal infiltrators flooding the country’ were threatening the security and identity of the Jewish state.
“‘If we don’t stop their entry, the problem that currently stands at 60,000 could grow to 600,000, and that threatens our existence as a Jewish and democratic state,” Binyamin Netanyahu said at Sunday’s cabinet meeting. ‘This phenomenon is very grave and threatens the social fabric of society, our national security and our national identity.’ Israel’s population is 7.8 million.”
Why the emphasis, as per the quotes, on “illegal infiltrators”? Is it because an “infiltrator” is somehow more odious than an “alien”? And what about the placement of the factoid on Israel’s population? Did it just make sense to put it at that point in the article, or was the journalist, Harriet Sherwood, maybe thinking to herself that 60,000 out of almost 8 million isn’t all that much?
Further, has the Guardian forgotten what its own readers make of the “immigration problem”? Has the Mail & Guardian?
For the former, perhaps a quote from its archives (not too long ago, only 2009) would act as a refresher: “More Britons than anyone else (47% against a 27% European average) wanted to deny legal immigrants equal social benefits; more Britons than anyone else (44% against an average 24%) favoured reinforcing border controls to combat illegal immigration; and fewer Britons than anyone else (28% against a 43% European average) supported legalising the status of illegal immigrants.”
As for the latter, the less said about the attitude of South Africans to illegal immigration, the better. Instead, a quick run-through the policies of the nations that are seen as the world’s most progressive might help.
In Australia, illegal immigrants are commonly referred to as “boat people” and they make weekly headlines. If these news stories are anything to go by, Australians believe they are being “overrun” by illegals, with almost half the population viewing the problem on a par with education, health services and the economy. To appease its nervous voter base, the Australian government spends $1.06 billion a year keeping “boat people” in mandatory detention while processing asylum applications.
Thing is, less than 3% of asylum seekers actually arrive in Australia by boat, and a large proportion of illegals are from the UK and the US. One might also want to remember, with respect to Ms Sherwood’s article on Israel, that Australia too has around 60,000 illegals – out of a population of 22 million.
Then there’s Canada, where estimates range from 35,000 to 120,000 illegals, out of a population of 35 million (still a lot less percentage-wise than Israel). Illegal immigrants that are caught by the authorities of this fine country are given a mandatory one-year prison sentence. In the United States, estimates range from seven million to 20 million out of 313 million, admittedly one of the highest in the world, which might account for the fact that an average of 31,000 non-Americans are held in detention centres on any given day.
And Europe? We can dispense with most of the continent (including the famously liberal Scandinavians) by noting that a new EU immigration law allowing for the detention of illegal immigrants for up to 18 months before deportation has triggered outrage across Latin America.
But Israel, of course, is the villain. Noted Sherwood near the bottom of her piece: “Israel is also constructing the world’s largest detention centre for asylum seekers and illegal migrants, capable of holding 11,000 people. The ฃ58m building, close to the border, will receive its first detainees by the end of the year.”
What she didn’t note – although there was a link to the statement – was the response of Israeli government spokesman Mark Regev when asked about the detention complex: “We are a small country of 8 million. Last year we had more illegal immigrants than legal ones. We are currently the only first-world economy and the only democracy in the region. But for people coming from countries like Somalia and Sudan, we cannot be the solution.”
While the remark about Israel being a democracy is questionable, the argument has to stand – if the tolerant West can have tough immigration policies, why can’t Israel? In this sense, Sherwood and the Guardian (and by extension the Mail & Guardian) revealed their hand in the closing line of the piece, which was easily its most offensive: “Amid the anti-immigration clamour, some Israelis have argued that, in the light of Jewish history, their state should be sympathetic and welcoming to those fleeing persecution.”
To refer again to the argument in my piece for the Mail & Guardian a few weeks ago – the Holocaust doesn’t count as a valid excuse for the Netanyahu administration’s unconscionable treatment of Palestinians, so it certainly can’t count as a reason that Israel should throw open its doors to illegal immigrants.
Which is not to say, as per Mizroch, that I have now become one of those Jews from the Left who has seen the light and folded. I haven’t. Netanyahu, in terms of his treatment of millions of people who have a right to live as equal citizens within his country’s boundaries, very often comes across as a bigot. It’s just that sometimes the well-intentioned left-leaning media has racist tendencies too. DM
European Jewish organization raises prospect of banning far-right party in Greece
Thursday, May 17th, 2012PRAGUE — A major European Jewish organization is urging European governments to quickly adopt measures to tackle anti-Semitism and far-right extremism, including possibly banning a hardline Greek party that did unusually well in recent elections.
Moshe Kantor, president of the European Jewish Congress, was meeting with Czech Prime Minister Petr Necas on Wednesday to seek his support for “emergency measures” to protect the continent’s Jewish communities from violent hate crimes.
Kantor would not give details of the measures that his organization plans to propose, but they could involve passing legislation, sharing intelligence, and a public awareness campaign about anti-Semitic threats.
In particular, Kantor expressed concern about Golden Dawn, a party that did well during Greece’s May 6 election and whose leader claimed that Nazi concentration camps did not use ovens and gas chambers to kill prisoners during the Holocaust.
The party has rejected a neo-Nazi label but campaigned on an anti-immigration platform. Because the leading parties were unable to form a government in Greece, another election is expected, but the message sent by Golden Dawn’s performance has raised fears among minorities.
Kantor said Golden Dawn’s “political rise should have sent shock-waves through Europe.”
“Before calling on European leaders to act against hate on the street, they must clear their own house and that means banning and ostracizing any politicians and political parties that preach hate and violence,” he said. “While we highly value freedom of speech, we all recognize that there must be restrictions, and the visceral hatred propagated by the Golden Dawn is surely outside the boundaries of appropriate political discourse.”
Kantor plans to meet with EU foreign policy chief Catherine Ashton and Spanish Prime Minister Mariano Rajoy, and the congress consulted with Francois Hollande a few weeks before he was elected president of France.
“We have to be proactive. Otherwise we’re in a shameful position because we see the problem and we do not do anything,” Kantor told The Associated Press in an interview in Prague. “That’s why we’re here.”
The Czech Republic is one of Israel’s strongest allies in the European Union. The Czech government pushed for closer ties between the EU and Israel when it held the 27-nation bloc’s rotating presidency last year.
Kantor said the current economic crisis creates ripe conditions for anti-Semitism and that radical Muslim communities in Europe are ready to attack Jews because of the tension between Israel and the Palestinians and other Middle East countries.
A recent report on anti-Semitism said the number of attacks in Europe declined in 2011, but they were generally more violent than in previous years.
“It is a very dangerous trend,” Kantor said.
ANTI-SEMITISM MADE A CAPITAL OFFENSE
Monday, April 30th, 2012Interestinly, one of the first acts by the Bolsheviks was to make so-called “anti-Semitism” a capital crime. This is confirmed by Stalin himself: “National and racial chauvinism is a vestige of the misanthropic customs characteristic of the period of cannibalism. Anti-Semitism, as an extreme form of racial chauvinism, is the most dangerous vestige of cannibalism…under USSR law active anti-Semites are liable to the death penalty.” (Stalin, Collected Works, vol. 13, p. 30).
German state to republish ‘Mein Kampf’
Wednesday, April 25th, 2012The German state which owns the rights to Adolf Hitler’s manifesto “Mein Kampf” said Tuesday it would release an annotated version 70 years after the Nazi dictator’s suicide.
After winning a court battle last month against a British publisher who planned to publish parts of the anti-Semitic book alongside commentary from historians, Bavaria said it would put out its own edition by 2015.
State Finance Minister Markus Soeder told German news agency DPA the decision was taken after round-table talks with advocates and opponents of the move, and said it was aimed at “demystifying” the pages drenched in hatred and paranoid fantasy.

Hitler’s ‘Meim Kampf (Photo: AP)
“We want to make clear what nonsense is in there, however with catastrophic consequences,” Soeder said of the book on which much of the Nazis’ genocidal policies were based.
He said the state aimed with the release to already make future publication as “commercially unattractive” as possible.
In addition to the annotated book, the state also plans to put out an edition for schools that encourages a critical approach to the work.
Holocaust survivors and their families have expressed fears that neo-Nazis could seize upon the book as propaganda.
A court in the state capital Munich ruled in March that British publisher Peter McGee would violate Bavaria’s copyright on the work if he went ahead with plans to sell excerpts with explanations and commentary on German newsstands. McGee has vowed to appeal the decision.
Hitler wrote “Mein Kampf” (“My Struggle”), in 1924 while languishing in a Bavarian prison, and combined elements of autobiography with his views on Aryan “racial purity”, his hatred of Jews and his opposition to communism.
Millions of copies were distributed before his death in 1945.
It is not banned as such in Germany but since the end of World War II, Bavaria — which holds the rights until the end of 2015 — has not permitted reprints.
From 2016, third parties will be able to release copies of the work without obtaining permission from the state “unless it is used to incite racial hatred,” Soeder said.
“4-20″ and swastika graffiti on Colorado Springs synagogue
Saturday, April 21st, 2012The Anti-Defamation League is calling on Colorado Springs police to investigate as a bias-motivated or hate crime this morning’s discovery of a swastika, “4:20″ and “WSC” painted on two walls of a synagogue .
Temple Beit Torah‘s caretaker, Stan Peters, quickly painted over the graffiti after police examined it. They were called to the synagogue at 522 E. Madison St. just after 7 a.m.
Peters said police told him earlier today they are calling the incident “criminal mischief,” according to the Colorado Springs Gazette. The ADL said that’s not sufficient. Police did not return the Post’s call.
The “4:20″ mark alongside the Nazi emblem of a swastika is an apparent reference to the birthday of German leader and anti-Semite Adolph Hitler, said ADL Mountain States Regional Director Scott Levin.
“We call upon the Colorado Springs Police Department to investigate this matter as a bias-motivated crime,” Levin said in a statement issued late this afternoon. “We hope the perpetrators will be found and prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law. We deplore these despicable and hateful acts acts that affect not only the Jewish community but also the community at large.”
Anti-Semitism takes the stage in Hungary
Monday, April 2nd, 2012First went the director, then the prima donna.
A political tug-of-war over an historic theater in the Hungarian capital has reignited concerns about growing anti-Semitism in this Eastern European nation.
Budapest’s picturesque New Theater has long been a popular mainstay among the local cultured and urbane, who tend to be disproportionately liberal and include many of the local Jewish community. But recently, a series of firings and resignations have left the popular theater in the hands of avowed anti-Semites, sparking protests and political violence.
The deterioration of the storied theater highlights an emerging trend of rising neo-Nazi sentiment in parts of Eastern Europe of neo-Nazi sentiment. Cloaked in nationalism, the ideology has gained new traction amid Europe’s economic crisis, which far-right politicians have sought to blame on Jews and other ethnic minorities such as the Roma. Those ideas are particularly disturbing to many here, in a country where the second highest number of Jews in Europe were murdered during World War II, and from where the highest number of Roma were transported to Nazi death camps.
Since the beginning of the year, Jews — along with other national minorities — have once again been excluded from the Hungarian constitution‘s definition of the “Hungarian people.” New research from Central European University shows that the number of Hungarians with anti-Semitic views has risen from 14 percent to 24 percent since 2006.
“Ever since the [euro zone debt] crisis in 2009, they’ve been asking, who’s responsible for the crisis? Banks and bankers. And who are they? Jews,” said Robert Frohlich, the chief rabbi at Budapest’s central Dohany Street Synagogue.
Frohlich was referring to Jobbik, a vocal, neo-fascist political party that he says blames Hungary’s Jewish community in messages that are both “encoded and direct.” Jobbik is the most popular far-right party in Europe today. It is opposed to big banks and the European Union, and has gained popularity with vehement attacks on the country’s Roma minority. About one-quarter of Hungarian voters currently support Jobbik, making it the second most popular party in Hungary.
The party has been growing in the polls ever since Viktor Orbán’s Fidesz won office two years ago. Fidesz, which has a two-thirds majority in the Hungarian parliament, has changed the political climate in the country, perhaps irrevocably. It passed the new constitution emphasizing Hungarian ethnic identity. Meanwhile, the conservative party has fought with the International Monetary Fund and the European Union over political changes perceived as anti-democratic elsewhere on the continent. And it has failed to improve the Hungarian economic situation, which remains dire — fostering the growth of Jobbik, some opponents assert.
At the New Theater, though, former and current employees and some theater patrons say that the shift toward anti-Semitism has been a combination of the subtle and overt messages from the conservative parties.
For a decade, Istvan Marta, a 60-year old Hungarian composer, ran the New Theater, staging adaptations of Western European classics, from Shakespeare to Schiller.
But earlier this year, he was forced to step down after his contract wasn’t renewed in November by the Budapest City Council, which is dominated by the ruling party, Fidesz. The city council, as the owner of the theater, has been required since the end of the communist era to choose directors for its theaters for four-year tenures. In the past, whenever a director proved to be successful at the job, the contract extension has been automatic.
New applicants for the job were usually only considered if the theater was either in deep debt or if the council was dissatisfied with the artistic performance of the theater.
In Marta’s case neither of the scenarios occurred — the theater was doing well, both financially and artistically.
Even so, a well-known former politician and playwright, Istvan Csurka, was initially appointed artistic director at the theater last November. Csurka was ardently pro-Jobbik.
But Csurka never took up his job at the New Theater. He was forced to retract his nomination after he wrote a rant against Hungarian-American financier George Soros saying that Soros’ projects in Hungary “only serve to keep a well defined section of the Jewish community in power.”
Without a contract extension, Marta then stepped down in February, even though an independent panel set up to assess the situation recommended to the mayor that he stay.
Budapest’s mayor replaced him with Gyorgy Dorner, a dramatist notorious for his anti-Semitic views and an outspoken campaigner for Jobbik. The appointment has sparked outrage in the arts scene, and among the Jewish community and other left-leaning Hungarians.
ts for comment. But last month, he told the daily Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung,”I won’t let the New Theater become a stage for far right or anti-Semitic forces in Hungary.”
At the New Theater, the change has been marked. Actors, theatergoers and sponsors have since walked away from the once popular theater — as well as its popular prima donna, Lia Pokorni.
“Leaving Budapest’s New Theater was a strong setback for me but I just couldn’t stay,” said Pokorni, who is of Jewish heritage. “[I] could not work with a director who is so strongly associated with radical right-wing theories and emotions.”
Since January, a number of theater personnel have lost their jobs, as the new management – in agreement with the owner, the Budapest City Council did not extend their contracts. Several of those let go are of Jewish origin while others refuse to disclose their religious or ethnic background.
Others left because they believed they would be targeted next, staff insiders say. One, who asked that that his name not be published because of ongoing contract negotiations, said he worries about his job because he believes that his religion now plays a role in the new director’s employment decisions.
This employee said that Dorner told him that from now on, the theater would only employ people who “fear and believe in God.”
“It was never really a question of whether I believed in God or not,” the man said of the exchange. “Rather, I think he just wanted to hint at my Jewish origins, which I did not want to discuss at all.”
The changes have also sparked political violence.
Clashes outside the theater in early February pitted neo-Nazis against liberal demonstrators in which dozens were injured. Hungary’s far right, which overwhelmingly supports the theater’s new management, has fought against the growing anti-government protest movement in the central European country — and Budapest’s cultural scene — since the beginning of the year.
“I have no doubt about the type of plays the new director will put on the stage,” said Katalin Nemeth, a pensioner who has been a season ticketholder at the New Theater for years, but has not bought a ticket this month.
Dorner, who once was the voice of Bruce Willis and Eddy Murphy in many Hungarian movies, calls himself a “radical nationalist,” and says he wants foreign influences off the stage.
“I want to see Hungarian plays being brought onto the stage for Hungarian crowds to cheer,” Dorner said in an interview with a local paper.
He has publicly said his vision for the New Theater involves “cutting in on the leftist and Jewish dominated populated theater scene.”
Dorner also plans to stage a play by Csurka, the man initially appointed to run the theater’s artistic program, who has since died. The play, “The Sixth Coffin,” deals with Trianon, the treaty agreed after World War One that left Hungary with just one-third of its former territory.
It is a subject that infuriates Hungary’s neighbors, Slovakia, Romania, the Ukraine and Serbia because they fear Hungarian territorial expansion due to the large Hungarian minorities still living in their countries.
But Dorner has few qualms about raising the subject or doing more to provoke. Recently, he promised to rename the theater “Hatorszag” (Hinterland), a concept, critics say, invokes Hungarian claims on its neighbors’ territory. Budapest’s mayor vetoed the suggestion, but the idea lingers.
Dorner also fired the theater’s lead actor Balazs Galko. While Galko had been silent on political issues, he has been a regular at anti-government demonstrations. These days, Galko recounts how, after he was fired, he was told rather amiably by Dorner that he should not expect to get a job in the Budapest cultural scene in the future.
Dorner’s actions outraged Galko, he says. In January, Dorner took to the stage at a demonstration held by Jobbik, and stood next to the party’s leader, Gabor Vona, as party members torched a European Union flag.
“This is our message to the European Union if it does indeed want to colonize us: [EU Commission President Manual] Barroso thinks we are idiots, and he treats us like that too — and we won’t take it,” Vona said at the event.
“It made me feel uneasy when I saw Dorner was present at the burning of the European flag,” said Galko. “And I wanted to keep my job but I could not just overlook these disturbing changes.”
The Region: France: Here comes the whitewash
Monday, March 26th, 2012The murders in Toulouse should be a wake-up call for France. True, the attacks on Jews and French soldiers were three individual terror attacks perpetrated, perhaps, by one person. Yet they are among dozens of incidents that happen daily in French cities, in schools, and in all aspects of life. A big story like the Toulouse attack can draw attention to a broader, dangerous social trend. Or it can be treated as an isolated incident.
Nothing to see here; move along; go back to sleep.
In the past, the mass media could be expected to present a debate on this issue, but now, all too often, they give a monopoly to the white-washers and the apologists. Phase one is to present any terrorist as a right-winger, neo-Nazi, or opponent of left-wing policies.
If the terrorist is a Muslim, however, his own explanations – citing dominant interpretations of Islam and the goal of furthering an Islamist revolution – are ignored.
Instead, he or they are presented as confused, psychologically disturbed individuals; victims of discrimination; or, in short, anything other than ideologically motivated revolutionaries.
Perhaps the leading “professional” apologist for France in this context is Justin Vaisse. In an article in Foreign Policy, “The ‘New Normal’ in France?” he claims that Mohamed Merah, the Toulouse terrorist, was sort of a Sad Sack character merely seeking to take his fate into his own hands and to emerge as the defender of oppressed Muslims in France. In other words, he’s sort of a combination of a self-help fanatic and a crime-fighting superhero.
As for France itself, anti-Semitism is supposedly declining.
There’s no problem, and few major attacks on Jews. Everything is just fine. No need to make changes; no need to demand that Muslims teach tolerance and fight against extremists in their own ranks; no need to provide more protection for Jewish institutions.
And no need for a real soul-searching about the constant demonization of Israel in the French media and, at times, schools.
Is this disgusting? Yes, and it’s also dangerous. The subhead on the article tells us the Toulouse attack is merely “a banal and fading version of extremism.”
To a Jewish ear, the word “banal” recalls the famous Hannah Arendt line about the “banality of evil” in the Holocaust, while the word “fading” means the problem is going away. It so happens that I have met Monsieur Vaisse and discussed these issues with him.
At that time he was an adviser on Islam in the French government.
Vaisse had just written a book saying that there was no real political problem regarding Muslims in France. The book was quickly translated into English and published by a prestigious Washington research center.
According to Vaisse, the entire difficulty lay with economic and social issues. The problem was that Muslims were poor and badly treated.
If this were fixed then there would be no radicalism, Islamism, or terrorism. I asked him: Accepting your premise for the moment, why should we possibly believe that France can solve the economic and social problems involved? There aren’t good jobs; there is no prospect of better housing and higher living standards. Government regulations discourage entrepreneurship.
So in the context of your worldview, isn’t the prospect for more radicalization and violence? He simply gave no serious answer.
And this, I should add, was before the current international economic crash and the Paris riots.
But there’s more. A colleague asked Vaisse what sources he used in composing his study.
Only French-language sources, he replied. My astonished colleague said that nothing could be understood without looking also at the Arabic material that French Muslims were writing and reading. In fact, this person added, there was an Arabic-language bookstore within five minutes’ walk of Vaisse’s office and we could go there right now and see the radical, anti- Semitic child-raising manuals being sold there. These books, my colleague added, weren’t just sitting on the shelves, they were being bought and used.
Vaisse showed zero interest in this point.
Incidentally, in the Netherlands – in contrast to France – Jewish groups successfully protested the sale of these child-raising manuals telling parents to teach their kids that Jews were evil and should be extirpated. The Dutch government responded by ordering little strips of white paper be glued over the offending passages.
My host then showed me, with a flick of his finger, how easily these paste-overs could be removed and the sections calling for the killing of Jews be read.
Now consider this point. I am unaware of a single incident in Europe or North America when a non-Muslim attacked Muslims with guns or bombs in an attempt to kill the maximum number possible.
Probably, you could find a couple of such cases, but it won’t be easy and they won’t be many. It is the Jews who are being targeted as a group by many levels of violence and intimidation. This is a secret to nobody except Western governments, “experts” and much of the mass media.
I have listened in France to discussions among Jews over what parts of their cities were safe to live in and which ones were dangerous. The key factor is whether you are wealthy enough to move away from the threats. I’ve heard Jewish parents discussing the traumatic experiences of their children in the public schools. French Jews are either leaving France or at least buying homes in Israel.
Aside from reports in mostly Jewish media, I know about this because I hear more and more French being spoken in Tel Aviv’s streets. My real estate agent friend has had a growing number of French clients, some of whom leave their families in Israel and commute to work in France.
These people know what’s actually going on in France and other countries.
Der Spiegel, for example, interviews Daniel Ben-Simon, an expert on the subject who explains there are, “hundreds of anti-Semitic incidents” a year, committed mainly by Arab immigrants. Indeed, the teacher and his two children murdered in Toulouse were French Jews who had emigrated to Israel until he had been persuaded to return to France to work in the school.
So while we will be told to listen to Vaisse and such people, these reassuring lies have nothing to do with reality. Yet this is not just a matter of misinformation.
Such falsehoods encourage governments and institutions not to prepare, not to change their ways, not to learn from bloody experience.
And that means there will be more such tragedies, as well as hundreds of other incitements to anti-Semitism, blood libels against Israel, and acts of anti-Jewish hatred that you will never hear about. Hiding the truth only ensures that the problem grows and the tragedies are repeated.
















