Posts Tagged ‘Berlin’

Parliament must pay €50,000 to neo-Nazi party

Friday, August 17th, 2012

The NPD sued after its party financing was withheld by the federal authorities. Money is granted to every political party according to the level of popular support.

Officials said the move was to compensate for money due to be repaid by the DVU – another extreme right party which merged with the NPD in 2010.

But the Berlin administrative court ruled on Thursday that according to political party law, no merger had taken place – rather the DVU had been closed and was in liquidation, leaving no residual responsibility for the NPD.

The parliamentary administration is now checking to see whether in this case, the claims of the DVU for party financing should also not be carried over to the NPD. A statement said officials would examine the court’s ruling to see what consequences could be drawn from it.

A further legal fight between the NPD and the parliamentary administration remains undecided – concerning €2.5 million which the party was told by another court to pay after serious problems were found in its accounts for 2007. The party’s appeal will be heard at the federal administrative court in December.

Also on Thursday, the deputy head of the NPD Udo Pastörs was handed an eight-month suspended sentence after being convicted of slandering and defaming the victims of the Nazi dictatorship.

Pastörs is a member of the Mecklenburg Western-Pomerania state parliament, spoke there during a January 2010 debate of “a victory of lies over the truth” and of a “cult of guilt” and “theatre of concern”.

The judge was shown a video of Pastörs talking, which she described as hate speech. His defence had argued that he enjoyed parliamentary indemnity, which guarantees freedom of speech to members of state and federal parliaments.

But the judge agreed with the prosecution’s contention that the law specifically excludes libelous defamation from that protection, although she did say the particular case was a question of interpretation.

Pastörs was convicted of incitement in October 2010 by a court in Saarbrücken which gave him a 10-month suspended sentence and fined him €6,000. That verdict is not yet legally binding, so it has no bearing on the sentence from Thursday.

Enhanced by Zemanta

Great Depression Begins

Wednesday, August 1st, 2012

When the stock market collapsed on Wall Street on Tuesday, October 29, 1929, it sent financial markets worldwide into a tailspin with disastrous effects.

Fallout from the Great Depression – A young and hopelessly unemployed Berliner panhandles for spare change. Below: A run on a bank in Berlin.
Below: May Day 1930 brings a huge turn-out of pro-communist Berliners expressing admiration of Soviet Russia.

The German economy was especially vulnerable since it was built upon foreign capital, mostly loans from America and was very dependent on foreign trade. When those loans suddenly came due and when the world market for German exports dried up, the well oiled German industrial machine quickly ground to a halt.

As production levels fell, German workers were laid off. Along with this, banks failed throughout Germany. Savings accounts, the result of years of hard work, were instantly wiped out. Inflation soon followed making it hard for families to purchase expensive necessities with devalued money.

Overnight, the middle class standard of living so many German families enjoyed was ruined by events outside of Germany, beyond their control. The Great Depression began and they were cast into poverty and deep misery and began looking for a solution, any solution.

Adolf Hitler knew his opportunity had arrived.

In the good times before the Great Depression the Nazi Party experienced slow growth, barely reaching 100,000 members in a country of over sixty million. But the Party, despite its tiny size, was a tightly controlled, highly disciplined organization of fanatics poised to spring into action.

Since the failed Beer Hall Putsch in 1923, Hitler had changed tactics and was for the most part playing by the rules of democracy. Hitler had gambled in 1923, attempting to overthrow the young German democracy by force, and lost. Now he was determined to overthrow it legally by getting elected while at the same time building a Nazi shadow government that would one day replace the democracy.

Hitler had begun his career in politics as a street brawling revolutionary appealing to disgruntled World War I veterans predisposed to violence. By 1930 he was quite different, or so it seemed. Hitler counted among his supporters a number of German industrialists, and upper middle class socialites, a far cry from the semi-literate toughs he started out with.

He intentionally broadened his appeal because it was necessary. Now he needed to broaden his appeal to the great mass of voting Germans. His chief assets were his speech making ability and a keen sense of what the people wanted to hear.

By mid-1930, amid the economic pressures of the Great Depression, the German democratic government was beginning to unravel.

Gustav Stresemann, the outstanding German Foreign Minister, had died in October 1929, just before the Wall Street crash. He had spent years working to restore the German economy and stabilize the republic and died, having exhausted himself in the process.

The crisis of the Great Depression brought disunity to the political parties in the Reichstag. Instead of forging an alliance to enact desperately need legislation, they broke up into squabbling, uncompromising groups. In March of 1930, Heinrich Bruening, a member of the Catholic Center Party, became Chancellor.

Despite the overwhelming need for a financial program to help the German people, Chancellor Bruening encountered stubborn opposition to his plans. To break the bitter stalemate, he went to President Hindenburg and asked the Old Gentleman to invoke Article 48 of the German constitution which gave emergency powers to the president to rule by decree. This provoked a huge outcry from the opposition, demanding withdrawal of the decree.

As a measure of last resort, Bruening asked Hindenburg in July 1930 to dissolve the Reichstag according to parliamentary rules and call for new elections.

The elections were set for September 14th. Hitler and the Nazis sprang into action. Their time for campaigning had arrived.

The German people were tired of the political haggling in Berlin. They were tired of misery, tired of suffering, tired of weakness. These were desperate times and they were willing to listen to anyone, even Adolf Hitler.

Enhanced by Zemanta

Western state attracts most foreign investors

Sunday, July 15th, 2012

About 25 percent of international investors would tip Bavaria as a particularly attractive state, followed by neighbour Baden-Württemberg with ten percent, the study by consultancy firm Ernst & Young shows.

The more gritty western industrial state of North Rhine-Westphalia (NRW) is only tipped as an attractive region for investment by six percent of those asked.

Yet the figures show a different story, with by far the most foreign investment projects starting up in NRW, Sunday’s Die Welt newspaper reported.

Last year 155 foreign investment projects started up in NRW, more than three times the number in Bavaria.

“NRW is a strong economic location with good infrastructure and a big workforce potential,” study author Peter Englisch told the paper.

With 4,550 jobs created due to foreign investment in 2011, NRW was streets ahead of other states, with Berlin following with 1,975, Baden-Württemberg in third place with 1,817 and Bavaria in sixth place with 1,548.

NRW cities Düsseldorf and Cologne were among the top five top German spots for foreign investments. Düsseldorf leads with 52 projects last year, followed by Frankfurt with 48 and Berlin with 38. Bavaria’s Munich is ranked fourth with 31 projects.

The study also shows that Chinese firms are particularly keen to invest in NRW, while the Swiss tend to opt for Baden-Württemberg which is just next-door. British investors head for Berlin, even though, Englisch said, “Business orientation is missing there, as is support for investors.”

Tellingly, the vast majority of companies investing in the capital city were novices in Germany – of those already active in the country, just two percent said they could imagine setting up a business or subsidiary there.

The strongest industries were auto making and machine building, as well as information technology. Investors come to Germany intending to get a foothold in the market to increase turnover, the papers said, although the country is also highly-regarded as a place to conduct research.

Most of last year’s foreign investors came from the US, although there was an increase from Switzerland, fleeing the strong franc, said Englisch. Chinese investments were also on the increase.

Overall, foreign investment in Germany is rising, with the number of projects up by seven percent in 2011 over the previous year.

Enhanced by Zemanta

Bildbericht der Woche

Wednesday, May 2nd, 2012

Background: The Bildbericht der Woche was a weekly production of the Nazi Party’s Reichspropagandaleitung. It was a film strip with an accompanying text to be presented at small meetings. A speaker would read the text. These would be used in outlying areas where people had less access to the weekly newsreel at movie theaters, or at neighborhood party meetings. It was also used in the military.

This is #12/1939, issued at the end of March 1939. Hitler had just marched into what was left of Czechoslovakia and secured the return of the Memel District from Lithuania. I do not have the text that accompanied the pictures, but have identified what I could. If you can identify any of the pictures, please let me know.

In 1941, 1575 copies of this were produced each week.

Opening Graphic

The opening slide

The title slide

 

Hitler Enters Prague Castle

Cheering Crowds in Prague

Hitler Greeting Someone

 

Troops Marching

Anti-Jewish Measures Promptly Introduced

 

Troops Caring for Children

Nazi Flags Being Passed Out to Wave at Hitler

 

Hitler Drives Past

 

Another Picture of the Parade

 

Göring Greets Hitler

 

Searchlights in Berlin Celebrate Hitler’s Triumphs (19 March)

 

Map of the Memel District (in black)

 

The Memel Harbor

I’m not sure of this one

 

The poster translates: “Better to have fought and died honorably than to have lost freedom and ruined one’s soul!”

 

Hitler at the Railroad Station

 

A Seaman in the Harbor

 

The closing graphic

Projector

A German filmstrip projector

 

Enhanced by Zemanta

GANSSER, EMIL

Wednesday, May 2nd, 2012

(1874-1941) Siemens manager and NSDAP member from 1921. Gansser introduced Hitler to the National Club in Berlin and several times procured money for Hitler in Switzerland.

Enhanced by Zemanta

Joseph Goebbels and the Jews

Sunday, April 29th, 2012

Joseph Goebbels, Minister for Propaganda and Enlightenment in Nazi Germany, made clear in numerous public speeches his thoughts on the Jewsand the ‘Jewish Problem’. In his views he was not far removed from Hitler as was best seen afterKristallnacht – the Night of the Broken Glass. Goebbels made it clear to those present at a meeting immediately following Kristallnacht –Reinhard Heydrich and Hermann Goering – what should happen to the Jews.

 

“I am of the opinion that this is our chance to dissolve the synagogues. All those not completely intact shall be razed by the Jews. The Jews shall pay for it. There in Berlin, the Jews are ready to do that. The synagogues that were burned in Berlin are being levelled by the Jews themselves. We shall build parking lots in their place or new buildings. That ought to be the criterion for the whole country, the Jews shall have to remove the damaged or burned synagogues, and shall have to provide us with ready free space.

 

I deem it necessary to issue a decree forbidding the Jews to enter German theatres, movie houses and circuses.  Have already issued such a decree under the authority of the law of the Chamber for Culture. Considering the present situation of the theatres, I believe we can afford that. Our theatres are overcrowded, we have hardly any room. I am of the opinion that it is not possible to have Jews sitting next to Germans in varieties, movies and theatres. One might consider, later on, to let the Jews have one or two movies houses here in Berlin, where they may see Jewish movies. But in German theatres they have no business anymore. Furthermore, I advocate that the Jews be eliminated from all positions in public life in which they may prove to be provocative. It is still possible today that a Jew shares a compartment in a sleeping car with a German. Therefore, we need a decree by the Reich Ministry for Communications stating that separate compartments for Jews shall be available. In cases where the compartments are filled up, Jews cannot claim a seat. They shall not mix with Germans, and if there is no more room, they shall have to stand in the corridor.

 

Furthermore, there ought to be a decree barring Jews from German beaches and resorts. It’ll also have to be considered if it might not become necessary to forbid the Jews to enter the German forest. In the Grunewald, whole herds of them are running around. It is a constant provocation and we are having incidents all the time. The behaviour of the Jews is so inciting and provocative that brawls are a daily routine. “

 

With such views it is easy to understand that it was Goebbel’s ministry that was responsible for the film “The Eternal Jew”.


Enhanced by Zemanta

The Meaning of the Racial Laws of the Third Reich

Sunday, March 25th, 2012

“The Racial Question has an important role in the laws of other nations, though other peoples and races are affected than in the German Reich. It is in no way new or unusual that the German Reich is active in this area. Contrary to opinions that surface here and there, our laws are in no way directed against the Jewish religion, its practice, or the freedom of the Jewish faith.

The German Reich has done nothing but introduce constitutional legislation to provide the kind of civil service necessary to guarantee the secure administration of the Reich. The laws do not render it impossible for a citizen of a foreign state to become a civil servant. Indeed, if he is appointed to such a position, he receives full citizenship in the Reich. German civil servants should however be of Aryan descent. The so-called Aryan Law requires that each civil servant be of German blood. Since the vast majority of non-Aryan civil servants were Jews, the first guidelines to the law paid particular attention to those who were members of the Jewish race. But we did not simply throw out the non-Aryan civil servants, but retired them with honor and a pension. The people’s state could hardly proceed in a more legal and mild manner. Germany did not want to attack Jewry wildly, rather only deal with its results, is clear from the fact that the Law of 7 April 1933 left untouched all non-Aryan civil servants who had been appointed before 1 August 1914, and by the fact that the private sphere not affected. Some complain that the law extends to half and quarter Aryans. The answer is that the foreign influence in the civil service had grown to such a dangerous extent that it was almost impossible for young Germans to enter these professions.” (Reich Minister of the Interior Dr. Frick

The Impact of German Jewish Laws
The final five pages show the decline in the number of Jewish attorneys, notaries, and physicians in Prussia after the introduction of the Nazi racial laws. The figures show that the number of Jewish attorneys in Berlin fell from 1911 to 1227 between 7 April 1933 and 1 January 1934, a decline of 39.5%. Similar figures are cited for the rest of Prussia. The number of Jewish doctors in Berlin fell by 9.7% between October 1933 and February 1934. The pamphlet ends by praising the “more than humane” way in which the Nazis have gone about resolving the Jewish Question.

Enhanced by Zemanta

Jewry in the civil service

Monday, March 19th, 2012

With his usual determination, the Jew wormed his way into the German civil service apparatus, which is a model to the world. Here, too, he was not interested in the lower-level positions where one had to work hard and bear great responsibility for little pay, but rather in the upper-level and the highest positions. Only 0.7% of the non-Jewish population were top officials, but 2.6% of Jews were.

Within the German civil service, the legal system was of particular interest to the Jew. Here, the Jew sat in a position from which it was possible for him to force his will on his host people, enabling him to work on reaching his goal.

Of the 1062 judges in both state courts and the supreme court of German, 239 were Jews. That is 23%, or 23 times their percentage of the Jewish population in Germany. Of the nearly 6,000 judges in the whole of Prussia, about 7.5% were Jews. Of this 7.5%, or 430 Jewish judges, 12 were state court or senate presidents, and a further 109 were on appeals courts or district courts. About a third of Jewish judges in Prussia were in the highest civil service positions.

An even worse picture of Jewish dominance is clear when one examines attorneys. The flow of Jewry into this profession did not happen by chance. Here Jewry had the opportunity to practice the arts of distortion and concealment without any restrictions, things close to its nature.

Of the 3,400 attorneys practicing in Berlin, 1,850, or 54%, were Jews. Of the 11,800 attorneys admitted to practice in Prussia, 3,400 were Jews. Jewry made up about a third of notaries. Of the 33 members of the board of the bar association in Berlin, 22 were Jews. All the offices of the association were in Jewish hands. The officers of the highest legal association, the Reich Bar Association, were also all Jews.

Enhanced by Zemanta

The Jew in the German economy

Monday, March 19th, 2012

An examination of the three main areas of the German economy, agriculture and forestry, industry and the trades, and trade and commerce, shows clearly what the Jew had in mind.

Agriculture and forestry, which require hard labor for limited pay and a hard life, were not for him. Only 1.7% of the Jewish population worked in this branch of the German economy. There are no reliable statistics available, but one can assume this small element working in agriculture and forestry was not to be found behind the plow or working in the forests, but rather in leading positions in this branch of the economy.

Although the Jew was not inclined toward agricultural labor, he was at the forefront of commerce in agricultural products. The exchanges for grain, flour, fat, and eggs, to name only a few, were his field of endeavor. He sat in the breadbasket of the German people, and could set the prices higher or lower, depending on what pleased him. In the fall when the farmer was forced to sell his harvest to get the money he needed, prices had to be low. But when over the course of winter and spring these important products were needed by the public, prices had to rise. The difference between the buying and selling prices was the “profit” of the Jewish grain trader, or whatever he was called.

The Jew was significantly better represented in the second branch of the German economy, industry and the trades. Around 25% of the Jews were found in this branch of the economy. Given the Jew’s natural disinclination to working with his hands, one can assume that this percentage was not found in the trades, but only in industry.

But the real domain of Jewry was in the third branch, trade and commerce. Here he was in his element. 59% of the Jews were active in this part of the economy. In comparison, only 17% of the German population worked in this branch.

Some statistics: The board of the Berlin Stock Exchange consisted exclusively of Jews. — Of the 147 board and committee members of the Berlin exchange, 116, or 80%, were Jews.

When one considers the number of department store, which grew both in number and sales year by year, and realizes the steadily increasing Jewish control, it becomes clear why in conjunction with Jewish bank capital Judah’s position in this area was so strong and extensive. Nothing could happen that the Jews did not like.

What had been promised to to the Jew seemed to be fulfilled: “The Lord your God will bless you, as he has promised. You will lend to many peoples, and borrow from none. You will rule over many peoples, but no one will rule over you.”

The Jew seemed to have achieved his promised paradise, where he did not have to labor, where he did not have to earn his bread by the sweat of his brow. This last phrase shows clearly what the Jew thinks of labor. The millions of our German people’s comrades who were forced into involuntary vacations by the failures of the past system certainly would not have seen their unemployment as a blessing, but rather as a curse. The Jew, however, sees labor as a curse imposed on him, so long as he does not succeed in gaining the power that makes it possible for him to make others work for him so that he can live in paradise, or indolence.

Enhanced by Zemanta

Roosevelt’s Message to Adolf Hitler and Benito Mussolini (April 14, 1939)

Saturday, February 25th, 2012

 

His Excellency
Adolf Hitler,
Chancellor of the German Reich,
Berlin, Germany

You realize, I am sure, that throughout the world hundreds of millions of human beings are living today in constant fear of a new war or even a series of wars.

The existence of this fear—and the possibility of such a conflict-are of definite concern to the people of the United States for whom I speak, as they must also be to the peoples of the other nations of the entire Western Hemisphere. All of them know that any major war, even if it were to be confined to other continents, must bear heavily on them during its continuance and also for generations to come.

Because of the fact that after the acute tension in which the world has been living during the past few weeks there would seem to be at least a momentary relaxation—because no troops are at this moment on the march—this may be an opportune moment for me to send you this message.

On a previous occasion I have addressed you in behalf of the settlement of political, economic, and social problems by peaceful methods and without resort to arms.

But the tide of events seems to have reverted to the threat of arms. If such threats continue, it seems inevitable that much of the world must become involved in common ruin. All the world, victor nations, vanquished nations, and neutral nations, will suffer. I refuse to believe that the world is, of necessity, such a prisoner of destiny. On the contrary, it is clear that the leaders of great nations have it in their power to liberate their peoples from the disaster that impends. It is equally clear that in their own minds and in their own hearts the peoples themselves desire that their fears be ended.

It is, however, unfortunately necessary to take cognizance of recent facts.

Three nations in Europe and one in Africa have seen their independent existence terminated. A vast territory in another independent Nation of the Far East has been occupied by a neighboring State. Reports, which we trust are not true, insist that further acts of aggression are contemplated against still other independent nations. Plainly the world is moving toward the moment when this situation must end in catastrophe unless a more rational way of guiding events is found.

You have repeatedly asserted that you and the German people have no desire for war. If this is true there need be no war. Nothing can persuade the peoples of the earth that any governing power has any right or need to inflict the consequences of war on its own or any other people save in the cause of self-evident home defense.

In making this statement we as Americans speak not through selfishness or fear or weakness. If we speak now it is with the voice of strength and with friendship for mankind. It is still clear to me that international problems can be solved at the council table.

It is therefore no answer to the plea for peaceful discussion for one side to plead that unless they receive assurances beforehand that the verdict will be theirs, they will not lay aside their arms. In conference rooms, as in courts, it is necessary that both sides enter upon the discussion in good faith, assuming that substantial justice will accrue to both; and it is customary and necessary that they leave their arms outside the room where they confer.

I am convinced that the cause of world peace would be greatly advanced if the nations of the world were to obtain a frank statement relating to the present and future policy of Governments.

Because the United States, as one of the Nations of the Western Hemisphere, is not involved in the immediate controversies which have arisen in Europe, I trust that you may be willing to make such a statement of policy to me as head of a Nation far removed from Europe in order that I, acting only with the responsibility and obligation of a friendly intermediary, may communicate such declaration to other nations now apprehensive as to the course which the policy of your Government may take.

Are you willing to give assurance that your armed forces will not attack or invade the territory or possessions of the following independent nations: Finland, Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania, Sweden, Norway, Denmark, The Netherlands, Belgium, Great Britain and Ireland, France, Portugal, Spain, Switzerland, Liechtenstein, Luxemburg, Poland, Hungary, Rumania, Yugoslavia, Russia, Bulgaria, Greece, Turkey, Iraq, the Arabias, Syria, Palestine, Egypt and Iran.

Such an assurance clearly must apply not only to the present day but also to a future sufficiently long to give every opportunity to work by peaceful methods for a more permanent peace. I therefore suggest that you construe the word “future” to apply to a minimum period of assured non-aggression ten years at the least a quarter of a century, if we dare look that far ahead.

If such assurance is given by your Government, I shall immediately transmit it to the Governments of the nations I have named and I shall simultaneously inquire whether, as I am reasonably sure, each of the nations enumerated will in turn give like assurance for transmission to you.

Reciprocal assurances such as I have outlined will bring to the world an immediate measure of relief.

I propose that if it is given, two essential problems shall promptly be discussed in the resulting peaceful surroundings, and in those discussions the Government of the United States will gladly take part.

The discussions which I have in mind relate to the most effective and immediate manner through which the peoples of the world can obtain progressive relief from the crushing burden of armament which is each day bringing them more closely to the brink of economic disaster. Simultaneously the Government of the United States would be prepared to take part in discussions looking toward the most practical manner of opening up avenues of international trade to the end that every Nation of the earth may be enabled to buy and sell on equal terms in the world market as well as to possess assurance of obtaining the materials and products of peaceful economic life.

At the same time, those Governments other than the United States which are directly interested could undertake such political discussions as they may consider necessary or desirable.

We recognize complex world problems which affect all humanity but we know that study and discussion of them must be held in an atmosphere of peace. Such an atmosphere of peace cannot exist if negotiations are overshadowed by the threat of force or by the fear of war.

I think you will not misunderstand the spirit of frankness in which I send you this message. Heads of great Governments in this hour are literally responsible for the fate of humanity in the coming years. They cannot fail to hear the prayers of their peoples to be protected from the foreseeable chaos of war. History will hold them accountable for the lives and the happiness of all—even unto the least.

I hope that your answer will make it possible for humanity to lose fear and regain security for many years to come.

A similar message is being addressed to the Chief of the Italian Government.

 

Enhanced by Zemanta