Posts Tagged ‘German’

Frank Baylies

Sunday, October 14th, 2012

Frank Leamon Bayliss (1895-1918) achieved 12 victories as an American air ace serving with the French Air Service during World War I.

Born in New Bedford, Massachusetts on 23 September 1895 Baylies was inspired to enlist with the U.S. Ambulance Section in New York in 1916 when aged 20 after hearing a returning minister speak of the work of the ambulance service on the Western Front.

Posted to France in March 1916 Baylies spent the remainder of the year in European trenches serving with the U.S. Ambulance Section, seeing action at Verdun, the Somme, the Argonne and – for three months – Serbia.  For his bravery while under fire Baylies was awarded the Croix de Guerre.

Leaping at the opportunity presented to him in May 1917 to escape the rat-infested trenches for a career with the French Air Service, Baylies emerging as a trained pilot on 20 September 1917.  He was assigned first to Spa73 in mid-November and then to Spa3 as a Sergeant a month later.

Baylies opened his aerial ‘kill’ score on 18 February 1918 by bringing down a German two-seater north of Forges.  Between this date and 31 May 1918 he amassed 12 air victories, all while flying SPAD aircraft with Spa3.  During the early part of 1918 Baylies was offered a commission with the U.S. Air Service – now that America had entered the war - but declined, choosing to remain with the French Air Service.  In the event he did transfer in May as a 2nd Lieutenant although he nevertheless remained with Spa3.

At one stage Baylies had written that when flying his aircraft “one sails serenely and majestically… way up in the sunlight and clouds, giving hardly a thought to the terrible fight that is raging below, with a wonderful feeling of safety and security”.

The reality was that the fatality rate among airmen was formidably high and on 17 June 1918 Baylies was shot down and killed near Rollet (where he was initially buried) by a Fokker Triplane from German squadron Jasta 19, one of four aircraft from Jasta 19 that Baylies engaged that day.

Following his crash-landing a German airmen flew over Allied lines to drop a note confirming his death and subsequent burial with full military honours.  Aged just 22 at his death Baylies’ body was exhumed in 1927 and reburied in Paris.  Aside from his 12 confirmed kills Baylies was believed to have scored a further eight unconfirmed victories.

Enhanced by Zemanta

Ground Attack

Saturday, October 13th, 2012

Ground attack is a close relative to tactical bombing.  It is aimed at disrupting enemy forces at or near the front and during the course of the battle itself.  While strategic and tactical bombing raids are planned and directed at specific targets, ground-attack is often carried out against targets of opportunity, as they appear on a changing battle-field.  It is carried out by strafing and by dropping small munitions such as hand grenades.  Ground attack is carried out from very low altitudes and is thus both extremely accurate and extremely hazardous.

During the Battle of Messines, in June of 1917, British air force commander Hugh Trenchardordered the British pilots to fly low over the lines and strafe whatever targets presented themselves.  This was in order to harass the troops and break their morale.  During the Third Battle of Ypres which followed, this tactic was further pursued and developed with Sopwith Camels armed with four 9kg (20 lb) bombs raiding enemy trenches and approaches.  While effective, the loss rate of the attacking planes was very high.

At about the same time the Germans took delivery of the Halberstadt CL II.  This was a two seater tractor aircraft intended originally as an escort fighter for observer planes.  Realizing the effectiveness of direct ground attacks, flights of Halberstadt CL IIs were reorganized into attack flights (Schlachtstaffeln).

These planes were better equipped for ground-attack duties than the single-seater Allied fighters, which were particularly vulnerable to attack from above and behind, while the pilot was preoccupied with aiming and strafing.  In the Halberstadt the observer provided both warning and some level of protection from such attacks, and could assist by dropping bombs or grenades.

Erich LudendorffThe colossal, costly, and failed engagements of 1916 had led the military on both sides to seek out new weapons and tactics to change the way in which they waged the war.

The Germans developed a new tactic of “infiltration” – the use of lightly armed, mobile elite troops (Sturmtruppen) to break through the defensive lines and fight in the rear of the front line.  Ludendorff thought that the use of the Schlachtstaffeln would both aid the initial breakthrough, and help them consolidate those initial gains.

On the allied side of the front there was a willingness to rethink the use of the tank.  There had been much disappointment with its performance, but by mid 1917 the British command was open to the claims of Brigadier General H. Elles, the commander of the Tank Corps, that the tank had not been used on suitable terrain.

The British launched the Battle of Cambrai on the 20th of November 1917, attacking across dry and chalky ground, and using tactics developed by Lieutenant Colonel J. F. C. Fuller, the Tank Corps Staff Officer.

Fuller had coordinated three elements into his battle plan: an improved artillery system, massed tanks (over 320), and coordinated ground attack by 300 aircraft from fourteen RFC squadrons.  The planes attacked trenches, supply convoys, artillery emplacements and other front line installations.

They were highly effective, at times even saving the tanks from being pinned down.  But the cost to the airmen was high.  The German infantry had learned how to fight back against low flying aircraft, and once air reinforcements arrived the loss rate of ground attack aircraft was as high as 30 percent of aircraft deployed.  Entire squadrons were wiped out in less than a week.

On the ground, the initial success of the attack was so great that victory bells were rung in Britain for the first time since the beginning of the war.  But the celebration was premature.  The attack became bogged down, and the German’s counter-attacked.

John F. C. FullerIt was during this counter-attack that Ludendorff used his new infiltration tactics, and to great effect.  The spearheads of the Sturmtruppen were accompanied by carefully coordinated ground attacks, the pilot strafing and the observer dropping grenades.  They were so effective that a British Court of Inquiry found that the Schlachtstaffeln were one of the major causes of the success of the German counter-attack.

The RFC learned a number of important lessons at Cambrai.  British pilots, taking a leaf from the French, improvised better camouflage so as not to be so visible to defending fighters: in particular the twin bright roundels on the upper wing provided an easily visible and effective aiming point.  (One simply had to aim between them to target the pilot.)

Sopwith began developing an aircraft specially designed for the needs of ground attack warfare – its most significant feature being armour plating to protect the pilot.  This became known as the Sopwith Salamander.

In May of 1918 Fuller began developing plans for the next year of combat.  This became known as “Plan 1919.”  Hailed as the precursor of the “Blitzkrieg,” one of the keystones of the plan was integrated ground attack using the Salamanders.  Large scale production was underway at the time of the armistice, but in practice the Salamander never saw combat.

When the Germans launched their final great push in March of 1918, they placed such an emphasis on ground attack that it was considered to be the most important task of the German planes.  Flying Halberstadt CL.II, the improved Halberstadt CL.IVs, and the specialist all-metal Junkers J1, they initially enjoyed tremendous success.

For their part, the allies found it hard to perform ground attack duties, and indeed found it hard to coordinate their air power at all, because they needed to evacuate seventeen of their forward airfields.  But by late March they had reorganized and began to inflict heavy losses on the German airforce.

T.E. Lawrence "of Arabia"By the time of the last German offensive, in mid July, shortages of pilots, aircraft and gasoline meant that their was little air support.  In a mirror image of the battle of Cambrai, the Allied counter-attack was strongly supported by coordinated ground attack.

Perhaps the most dramatic use of ground-attack occurred in Palestine.  By September of 1918 the British had complete control of the air, largely through the efforts of the First Squadron, Australian Flying Corps, flying the excellent two seat Bristol F2 Fighter and a single Handley-Page O/400.  (Ross Smith, who later won the 1919 England-Australia air race, was one of the pilots of this squadron.)

Following the success of Allenby’s attack at Megido on the 19th of September, the Turkish divisions were forced to retreat through the narrow defile of Wadi Farra.  On the 21st of September the Australians trapped them there, when they bombed the head and the tail of the Turkish column.  Together with RAF SE5as and DH9s the Australians mercilessly bombed and strafed the terrified Turks.

In the words of T. E. Lawrence, “When the smoke had cleared it was seen that the organization of the enemy had melted away.  They were a dispersed horde of trembling individuals, hiding for their lives in every fold of the vast hills.  Nor did their commanders ever rally them again.  When our cavalry entered the silent valley the next day they could count ninety guns, fifty lorries, and nearly a thousand carts abandoned with all their belongings.  The RAF lost four killed.  The Turks lost a corps.”

Enhanced by Zemanta

Fighters: The Fokker Scourge

Friday, October 12th, 2012

In spite of its innovative use ofdeflector gear the German Eindecker was in many ways an unexceptional aircraft.

In April of 1916 a captured Eindecker was tested by the Allies, and found to be inferior in performance to its Morane-Saulnier opposite number.  The interrupter gear was also far from perfect – both Boelcke andImmelmann survived shooting off their own propeller.

The impact of the interrupter-gear Eindecker, however, was enormous.  The heretofore appreciated stability of the Allied aircraft became a liability as they could not escape the more manoeuvrable Eindecker.  The French were forced to curtail their successful day bombing operations and turn to night bombing.  The RFC began to suffer losses approaching two a day.

The great German offensive against Verdun began in early 1916.  In accordance with the German plan to bleed the French army dry, Falkenhayn determined to use their control of the air to do the same thing to the Armee de l’Air, and to blind the French artillery by shooting their observer aircraft out of the skies.

Boelcke, who had done much to develop the tactics of aerial warfare, was moved to Rethel, nearer to Verdun, to command a new Kampfeinsitzerkommando - a single seater detachment.  Immelmann remained in command at Douia.

For the opening six months of 1916 the Germans maintained control of the air.  It was wrested from their grasp, but slowly.  By the opening of the Battle of the Somme in July, the Eindecker was obsolete.  Boelcke was to refer to July and August of 1916 as “the blackest days in the history of German military aviation.”

The Eindecker, ironically, was unseated by aircraft already available before Fokker’s invention of the interrupter gear, and none of them ever had interrupter gear installed.  It was the combination of four types of aircraft that defeated the Eindecker.

Three of them were British, and they were all pusher aircraft – the Gun Bus, the FE2b, and the DH2.  The fourth was the altogether far more impressive French Nieuport 11 “Bebe” (Baby).  This was a tractor sesquiplane (a biplane, but with the lower wing significantly smaller than the upper wing.)

Its armament consisted of a Hotchkiss or Lewis gun mounted on the upper wing, much in the same configuration as that tried out by Louis Strange, but on a sliding mount allowing the pilot to pull the machine gun down towards him.  This was intended to allow the pilot to shoot upwards at an angle, in addition to removing the need to stand when reloading or servicing the weapon.

The French officially adopted the “ace” system during the battle of Verdun.  Many of these pilots were concentrated in a famous squadron, the Cigognes (Storks), and the aces Navarre,Nungesser and Guynemer, all flying Nieuports, became household names.

It was not just the aircraft themselves that returned control of the air to the Allies.  It was only during 1916 that these aircraft appeared at the front in significant numbers and that they were organized into fighter units.

The Allies, with the French taking the lead, learned the value of flying in defensive formations of four to five aircraft, matching the three to four plane offensive patrols of the Germans.

If the Fokker Scourge was symbolically opened by Boelcke’s first victory, it was symbolically closed when Max Immelmann was killed during a fight with an FE2b on June 18th 1916.  Whether he was shot down, as claimed by the Allies, or shot away his own propeller, as claimed by the Germans, is still a matter of debate.

Enhanced by Zemanta

The Battle of Tannenberg, 1914

Tuesday, October 9th, 2012

Perhaps the most spectacular and complete German victory of the First World War, the encirclement and destruction of the Russian Second Army in late August 1914 virtually ended Russia’s invasion of East Prussia before it had really started.

Russia’s incursion into German territory was two-pronged.  General Samsonov had begun to take his Second Army into the south-western corner of East Prussia whilst General Rennenkampf advanced into its north-east with the First Army.  The two armies planned to combine in assaulting General Prittwitz’s German Eighth Army, Rennenkampf in a frontal attack while Samsonov engulfed Prittwitz from the rear.

Such was the Russians’ initial plan.  Rennenkampf brought about a modification however following a scrappy victory against Eighth Army at the Battle of Gumbinnen, after which he paused to reconsolidate his forces.

Prittwitz, shaken by the action at Gumbinnen and fearful of encirclement, ordered a retreat to the River Vistula.  Upon receipt of this news Helmuth von Moltke, the German Army Chief of Staff,  recalled Prittwitz and his deputy von Waldersee to Berlin – an effective dismissal – and installed as their replacement the markedly more aggressive combination of Paul von Hindenburg - brought out of retirement at the age of 66 – and Erich Ludendorff as his Chief of Staff (having earlier distinguished himself at Liege).

Upon his arrival in East Prussia on 23 August Hindenburg immediately reversed Prittwitz’s decision to withdraw, choosing instead to authorise a plan of action prepared by ColonelMaximilian Hoffmann, Prittwitz’s deputy chief of operations.  While Hindenburg and Ludendorff received much credit for the subsequent action at Tannenberg, the actual plan of attack was devised in detail by Hoffmann.

General Samsonov, commander of the Russian Second ArmyHoffmann proposed a ploy whereby cavalry troops would be employed as a screen at Vistula, the intention being to confuse Rennenkampf who, he knew, held a deep personal vendetta with Samsonov (who had complained of Rennenkampf’s conduct at the Battle of Mukden in 1905) and so would be disinclined to come to his aid if he had justifiable cause not to.

Meanwhile, General Hermann von Francois’s  I Corps were transported by rail to the far southwest to meet the left wing of Samsonov’s Second Army.  Hindenburg’s remaining two corps, under Mackensen and Below, were to await orders to move south by foot so as to confront Samsonov’s opposite right wing.  Finally, a fourth corps was ordered to remain at Vistula to meet Samsonov as his army moved north.  The trap was being set.

Samsonov meanwhile, bedevilled by supply and communication problems, was entirely unaware that Rennenkampf had chosen to pause and lick his wounds at Gumbinnen, instead assuming that his forces were continuing their movement south-west.

Samsonov was similarly unaware of Hoffmann’s plan or of its execution.  Assured that his Second Army was en route to pursue and destroy the supposedly retreating Eighth Army (and supported in doing so by overall commander Yakov Zhilinski, who was subsequently dismissed for his part in the following debacle), he continued to direct his army of twelve divisions – three corps – in a north-westerly direction towards the Vistula.  The remaining VI Corps he directed north towards his original objective, Seeburg-Rastenburg.

On 22 August the bulk of Samsonov’s forces reached the extremities of the German line, fighting (and winning) small actions as it continued to advance into the German trap of encirclement.

Ludendorff issued an order to General Francois to initiate the attack on Samsonov’s left wing at Usdau on 25 August.  Remarkably, Francois rejected what was clearly a direct order, choosing instead to wait until his artillery support was in readiness on 27 August.  Ludendorff – along with Hoffmann – travelled to see Francois and to repeat the order.  Reluctantly, Francois agreed to commence the attack, but complained of a lack of shells.

Whilst returning from their meeting with Francois, Hoffmann was passed two intelligence intercepts that had been transmitted by Rennenkampf and Samsonov, respectively, in the clear, i.e. unciphered.  Their contents were explosive.

The first, sent by Rennenkampf, revealed the distance between his and Samsonov’s armies.  It further detailed his First Army’s imminent marching plans, and these were not towards Samsonov’s Second Army.

The import of the message was clear: the Germans need not fear intervention from the Russian First Army during their assault upon Samsonov’s forces.  The second intercepted message, from Samsonov, was similarly remarkable.

Having engaged – unsuccessfully – the heavily entrenched German XX Corps the previous day, 24 August, at the Battle of Orlau-Frankenau, Samsonov had noted what he took to be a general German withdrawal to Tannenberg and beyond.  Consequently, his message provided detailed plans for his intended route of pursuit of the German forces.

Col Maximilian Hoffman, Chief of Staff, German Eighth ArmyWith both messages in hand, Hoffmann promptly hurried after Ludendorff and Hindenburg and handed them the intercepts.  While Ludendorff was sceptical as to their authenticity, Hindenburg, having heard Hoffmann tell of the personal quarrel between Rennenkampf and Samsonov, was inclined to alter the German Eighth Army’s plans accordingly.

It was argued by Hindenburg and Hoffmann that Francois could, after all, await the arrival of sufficient artillery supplies before beginning his attack at Usdau, which in the event came two days later, on 27 August.  Ludendorff, keen to assert his authority over Francois, insisted that the attack begin as originally scheduled.

Francois however had no intention of attacking without artillery support.  Buying time he fell to bickering with Ludendorff and, as he intended, began his attack, by I Corps, on 27 August – and rapidly enjoyed marked success.  Rapidly taking Soldau on the Russian border, and so cutting communication with Samsonov’s centre, his forces confined Samsonov’s left to the frontier.

Despite his success, Francois did not enjoy the trust of either Hindenburg nor, especially, Ludendorff again, particularly once they both moved to Berlin to take over the direction and conduct of the war.

At this stage Ludendorff, fearful that Rennenkampf’s forces might yet suddenly join the fray, ordered Francois to move back north, another order ignored by Francois, who chose instead to take his corps east so as to prevent Samsonov’s centre from retreating over the border.  Although executed in disobedience of Ludendorff’s clear order, his bold action contributed to the sweeping success that followed.

Helmuth von Moltke, the German Army Chief of Staff in Berlin, was similarly nervous of the German Army’s prospects in the east.  He astonished Ludendorff by telephoning him with notification that he was dispatching a cavalry division and three corps from the west to bolster the Eastern Front.  Aware that the troops could be ill-afforded by the weakened German attack towards Paris – that is, by the precisely calculated execution of the Schlieffen Plan – Ludendorff protested that the reinforcements were unnecessary.  Nevertheless they were sent.

Having decided on 25 August – the day he was passed the Russian radio intercepts – that Rennenkampf’s forces were unlikely to attempt to join Samsonov Ludendorff sent the two corps stationed at Gumbinnen south where on the following day they met and brought into action Samsonov’s VI Corps moving northwards at Bischofsburg.  Surprised and disorganised, both divisions retreated separately for the Russian border.

Ignoring warnings of a massed German advance moving south, Zhilinksi directed Rennenkampf’s First Army to the west to Konigsberg on 26 August, a considerable distance from Samsonov’s plight.  Given the degree of personal enmity between Rennenkampf and Samsonov – they had physically come to blows on at least one occasion – the former had no particular inclination to come to Samsonov’s assistance.

Disastrously for Samsonov, Hoffmann and Ludendorff intercepted Zhilinksi’s unciphered order to Rennenkampf.  He promptly dispatched Below from Bischofsburg to rejoin the German centre, and sent Mackensen south to meet up with General Francois, where they joined in Willenberg, south of Bischofsburg, on 29 August.  Samsonov was by now surrounded.

At last, on 28 August, Samsonov finally became aware of the peril he faced.  Critically short of supplies and with his communications system in tatters, his forces were dispersed, and VI corps had already been defeated.  Consequently he ordered a general withdrawal on the evening of 28 August.

Paul von HindenburgIt was too late for Samsonov’s forces, as they scattered – many throwing down their weapons and running – directly into the encircling German forces.  Relief from the Russian border in the form of counter-attacks were weak and insufficient.

95,000 Russians troops were captured in the action; an estimated 30,000 were killed or wounded, and of his original 150,000 total, only around 10,000 of Samsonov’s men escaped.  The Germans suffered fewer than 20,000 casualties and, in addition to prisoners captured over 500 guns.  Sixty trains were required to transport captured equipment to Germany.

Samsonov, lost in the surrounding forests with his aides, shot himself, unable to face reporting the scale of the disaster to the Tsar, Nicholas II.  His body was subsequently found by German search parties and accorded a military burial.

Hindenburg and Ludendorff were feted as heroes at home in Germany.  Such was the lustre of the victory – combined with later albeit lesser successes at the First and Second Battles of the Masurian Lakes, that Hindenburg later replaced Erich von Falkenhayn as German Chief of Staff, bringing with him to Berlin Ludendorff as his quartermaster general.

A great propaganda victory, the scale of the Russian defeat shocked Russia’s allies, who wondered whether it signalled the defeat of the Russian army.  Such was not the case, as was demonstrated by the lesser scale of German victories at the Masurian Lakes.  As always, the sheer weight of the Russian army ensured its survival.  Even so, no Russian army penetrated German territory again until the close of the Second World War, in 1945.

Enhanced by Zemanta

The Battle of Le Cateau, 1914

Tuesday, October 9th, 2012

The Battle of Le Cateau was essentially a rearguard action fought by the British in late August 1914, during the general Allied retreat along the Western Front in the face of sustained German successes at the four Battles of the Frontiers.

On the night of 25 August the General Smith-Dorrien’s II Corps were pursued near Le Cateau by the German First Army under General von Kluck.  With his three divisions, plus a small cavalry corps, separated from Haig’s I Corps eight miles to the east at Landrecies, and furthermore finding himself unable to retreat without coming under attack anyway, Smith-Dorrien decided to fight an action the following morning.

The greatly fatigued condition of his troops – they had been fighting a retreat for several days by this stage – convinced Smith-Dorrien that psychologically as well as tactically, a fighting stand was appropriate.  However the BEF’s Commander-in-Chief, Sir John French, had specifically ordered a continued retreat on the evening of 25 August and, despite the relative success of the action, resented Smith-Dorrien’s decision to fight.  An acrimonious argument sprang up between the two men, ultimately leading to Smith-Dorrien’s removal from command under the pretext of ill-health.

Fortunately for Smith-Dorrien, only three divisions of the German First Army were available to conduct the fight.  Von Kluck himself, together with his Eastern Corps, was too far from the area to assist.  Instead, two western corps were dispatched in an unsuccessful attempt to outflank the BEF (prevented from doing so by the French Sixth Army under General Maunoury).

General Smith-DorrienGermany artillery began the action at dawn the next day, 26 August, across the eight miles of essentially open ground held by Smith-Dorrien’s forces.

The barrage continued until noon before German infantry began to advance.  Fighting predominantly with rifles fired from shallow trenches prepared hastily (a tactic similarly employed with great success at Mons), the British managed to greatly slow the advance of the German infantry, to the extent that Smith-Dorrien was able to organise a strategic retreat during the late afternoon despite overwhelming odds and in the absence of flank protection.

Losses however were high on both sides, including 7,812 British casualties.  Nevertheless the German forces suffered losses not only in manpower but, crucially, in further delaying their planned advance on Paris.

Enhanced by Zemanta

The Battle of Jutland, 1916

Sunday, October 7th, 2012

The greatest naval battle of the First World War.  Jutland had all the ingredients to be a great British naval victory, but in the event the result was much less clear-cut.

The recently appointed commander of the German High Seas FleetReinhard Scheer, had returned to the policy of making sorties against the British coast, confident that his codes were secure, and thus that the main British battle fleet, at Scapa Flow in the north of Scotland could not intervene.  However, the British could read German coded messages, and were aware of Scheer’s plan.

At the end of May, Scheer sortied with the entire High Seas Fleet, expected that the only serious threat he would meet was Admiral Beatty’s battle cruiser squadron based on the Forth.  Unfortunately for his plan, the Royal Navy knew he was coming, and the Grand Fleet sailed only minutes after the High Seas Fleet.

Both fleets sailed in a similar formation, with a scouting squadron of battle cruisers sailing ahead of the main battle fleets.  The battle falls into five main phases.  The first came when Admiral Beatty, commanding the British battle cruisers encountered their weaker German equivalent under Admiral Hipper, (31 May) and chased them south towards the main German fleet.

The second phase saw Beatty flee north, pursued by the German Dreadnoughts.  So far, both sides thought the battle was going to plan, although a design flaw led to the destruction of two British battle cruisers.  Now, in the third phase the Germans got a nasty surprise.  Thinking themselves involved in a chase that would end with the destruction of the British battle cruisers, they found themselves under bombardment from Jellicoe’s battle fleet, which they had thought to be too far north to intervene.

The heavy British guns quickly forced Scheer to order a retreat, but then Scheer made what could have turned into a grievous error, turning back, possibly hoping to pass behind Jellicoe, and escape into the Baltic.

However, Jellicoe had slowed down, and the German fleet found themselves crossing in front of the British fleet, and in ten minutes of gunfire suffered 27 heavy hits while only inflicted two.  Once again, Scheer ordered a retreat.

Admiral Reinhard von ScheerFinally, in the last phase of the battle, in a night of intense fighting, the retreat of the German battleships was covered by their lighter ships, while Jellicoe lost time after turning to avoid a potential torpedo attack.

The Germans lost one battle cruiser, one pre-Dreadnought, four light cruisers and five destroyers, while the British lost three battle cruisers, four armoured cruisers, and eight destroyers.  However, many of the surviving German heavy ships had suffered serious damage, and one result of the battle was to increase the British dominance in heavy ships.

Jutland was the last, and largest, of the great battleship battles.  Neither submarines or aircraft played any part in the battle, despite the plans of both sides.  Never again did battle fleets meet again in such numbers.  While the Royal Navy suffered more loses, the battle effectively ended any threat from the High Seas Fleet, which now knew it could not contest control of the North Sea with the Royal Navy.

The great fleet which Kaiser Wilhelm II had been obsessed with, and which had done so much to sour relations between Britain and Germany had proved to be a blunted weapon.  Despite that, the battle disappointed in Britain, where news of a new Trafalgar had been expected, and the hard fought draw at Jutland was not appreciated until much later, while the Kaiser claimed a German victory.

Enhanced by Zemanta

The Battle of Jutland, 1916

Friday, October 5th, 2012

The greatest naval battle of the First World War.  Jutland had all the ingredients to be a great British naval victory, but in the event the result was much less clear-cut.

The recently appointed commander of the German High Seas FleetReinhard Scheer, had returned to the policy of making sorties against the British coast, confident that his codes were secure, and thus that the main British battle fleet, at Scapa Flow in the north of Scotland could not intervene.  However, the British could read German coded messages, and were aware of Scheer’s plan.

At the end of May, Scheer sortied with the entire High Seas Fleet, expected that the only serious threat he would meet was Admiral Beatty’s battle cruiser squadron based on the Forth.  Unfortunately for his plan, the Royal Navy knew he was coming, and the Grand Fleet sailed only minutes after the High Seas Fleet.

Both fleets sailed in a similar formation, with a scouting squadron of battle cruisers sailing ahead of the main battle fleets.  The battle falls into five main phases.  The first came when Admiral Beatty, commanding the British battle cruisers encountered their weaker German equivalent under Admiral Hipper, (31 May) and chased them south towards the main German fleet.

The second phase saw Beatty flee north, pursued by the German Dreadnoughts.  So far, both sides thought the battle was going to plan, although a design flaw led to the destruction of two British battle cruisers.  Now, in the third phase the Germans got a nasty surprise.  Thinking themselves involved in a chase that would end with the destruction of the British battle cruisers, they found themselves under bombardment from Jellicoe’s battle fleet, which they had thought to be too far north to intervene.

The heavy British guns quickly forced Scheer to order a retreat, but then Scheer made what could have turned into a grievous error, turning back, possibly hoping to pass behind Jellicoe, and escape into the Baltic.

However, Jellicoe had slowed down, and the German fleet found themselves crossing in front of the British fleet, and in ten minutes of gunfire suffered 27 heavy hits while only inflicted two.  Once again, Scheer ordered a retreat.

Admiral Reinhard von ScheerFinally, in the last phase of the battle, in a night of intense fighting, the retreat of the German battleships was covered by their lighter ships, while Jellicoe lost time after turning to avoid a potential torpedo attack.

The Germans lost one battle cruiser, one pre-Dreadnought, four light cruisers and five destroyers, while the British lost three battle cruisers, four armoured cruisers, and eight destroyers.  However, many of the surviving German heavy ships had suffered serious damage, and one result of the battle was to increase the British dominance in heavy ships.

Jutland was the last, and largest, of the great battleship battles.  Neither submarines or aircraft played any part in the battle, despite the plans of both sides.  Never again did battle fleets meet again in such numbers.  While the Royal Navy suffered more loses, the battle effectively ended any threat from the High Seas Fleet, which now knew it could not contest control of the North Sea with the Royal Navy.

The great fleet which Kaiser Wilhelm II had been obsessed with, and which had done so much to sour relations between Britain and Germany had proved to be a blunted weapon.  Despite that, the battle disappointed in Britain, where news of a new Trafalgar had been expected, and the hard fought draw at Jutland was not appreciated until much later, while the Kaiser claimed a German victory.

 

 

Enhanced by Zemanta

The Eleventh Battle of the Isonzo, 1917

Wednesday, September 26th, 2012

Launched on 19 August 1917 the Eleventh Battle of the Isonzo was the final initiative along the Isonzo River to be launched by the Italians and their Chief of Staff Luigi Cadorna.

For a single-article background to the Isonzo battles clickhere.

Cadorna’s eleventh attempt at breaking the deadlock along the Isonzo and so finally putting an end to the ongoing war of attrition saw him gather together 51 divisions and 5,200 guns.  The target was, once again, to be the Carso and around the Italian bridgehead at Gorizia.

Having opened on the coastal zone Italian gains (under Duke Aosta’s Third Army) were achieved as the Austro-Hungarian line was inexorably pushed back.  In the north gains were particularly marked with some 10km of ground snatched from the Austro-Hungarians by Luigi Capello’sSecond Army.

Indeed the Italian advance was so successful (capturing the Bainsizza Plateau south-east of Tolmino) that the army outran its artillery and supply lines, thus preventing the further advance that may have finally succeeded in breaking the Austro-Hungarian army.  However the Austro-Hungarian line ultimately held and the attack was abandoned on 12 September 1917.

No further attempts were made by the Italians along the Isonzo.  All eleven Isonzo battles to date had been initiated by Cadorna; however a twelfth and final battle took place a month-and-a-half later.  Cadorna, aware that the Germans were planning a joint offensive with the Austro-Hungarians ordered Capello’s forces to withdraw his forward units to more readily defensible positions.  Capello’s decision to ignore Cadorna’s orders (buoyed by his own recent success) contributed to the Italian disaster the following month.

In late October Austria-Hungary’s ally, Germany, finally committed forces to a joint operation at Caporetto.  While the Austro-Hungarians had often pleaded for German assistance on the Italian Front it was only now granted with the recognition that the Austro-Hungarian army had finally been stretched to breaking point, with the consequent – and very real – possibility that the Italians would soon achieve their long-sought breakthrough.  Fortunately with hostilities on the Eastern Front ceasing along with Russia’s withdrawal from the war, German resources could be (and were) transferred to the Isonzo.

Often referred to as the Battle of Caporetto, the Twelfth Battle of the Isonzo was a spectacular success for the Central Powers and very nearly succeeded in knocking Italy out of the war.

 

Enhanced by Zemanta

The Destruction of Louvain, 1914

Thursday, September 20th, 2012

Between Liege and Brussels, the Belgian city of Louvain was the subject of mass destruction by the German army over a period of five days from 25 August 1914.  The city itself fell to the German First Army on 19 August 1914 as part of the German strategy to overrun Belgium during the month of August 1914.

Occupied therefore by the Germans the city was relatively peaceful for six days until 25 August.  On that date German units to the rear of the city were attacked by an initially successful Belgian force advancing from Antwerp.

Panicked, those German troops under fire withdrew to Louvain, which in itself caused confusion to German soldiers stationed in the city.  Shots were heard amid fearful cries that the Allies were launching a major attack.

Once it became clear however that no such Allied attack was underway or even imminent, the city’s German authorities determined to exact revenge upon Louvain’s citizenry, whom they were convinced that contrived the confusion that day.

The German form of retaliation was savage.  For five consecutive days the city was burnt and looted.  Its library of ancient manuscripts was burnt and destroyed, as was Louvain’s university (along with many other public buildings).  The church of St. Pierre was similarly badly damaged by fire.  Citizenry of Louvain were subject to mass shootings, regardless of age or gender.

As demonstrated earlier at other Belgian towns, including Dinant, the destruction of up to a fifth of Louvain’s buildings merely comprised a standard German strategy of intimidating occupied Belgian territories as a means of securing maximum civilian co-operation.

Already widely regarded as an unacceptable strategy internationally, the treatment of Louvain provoked highly critical press headlines (which routinely referred to German barbarism and ‘rivers of blood’) and caused great concern in neutral capitals.

With the government in Berlin unrepentant, the German retaliation ceased on 30 August.

 

Enhanced by Zemanta

The Siege of Maubeuge, 1914

Thursday, September 20th, 2012

The French town of Maubeuge comprised a major fort sited on France’s northern border with Belgium on the River Sambre.

On the junction of no fewer than five railway lines the town was consequently considered a key strategic location hence the construction of 15 forts and gun batteries around it, totalling some 435 guns.  The town’s permanent garrison of 35,000 troops was initially bolstered by its selection as the advance base of the newly-arriving British Expeditionary Force under Sir John French.

With the retreat of the latter and the French Fifth Army on 23 August 1914 the town was cut off from Allied forces and came under siege by the Germans on 25 August.  The town was finally surrendered by General Fournier to the Germans some 13 days later (court-martialed after the war for this action the General was eventually exonerated).

The forts were effectively reduced by German heavy artillery which succeeded in demolishing one by one each of the key forts barring the progress of the German Army through Belgium – although in slowing the German advance the Schlieffen Plan was made to look increasingly risky.

Enhanced by Zemanta