Posts Tagged ‘Nazi Germany’

Joseph Goebbels and the Jews

Sunday, April 29th, 2012

Joseph Goebbels, Minister for Propaganda and Enlightenment in Nazi Germany, made clear in numerous public speeches his thoughts on the Jewsand the ‘Jewish Problem’. In his views he was not far removed from Hitler as was best seen afterKristallnacht – the Night of the Broken Glass. Goebbels made it clear to those present at a meeting immediately following Kristallnacht –Reinhard Heydrich and Hermann Goering – what should happen to the Jews.

 

“I am of the opinion that this is our chance to dissolve the synagogues. All those not completely intact shall be razed by the Jews. The Jews shall pay for it. There in Berlin, the Jews are ready to do that. The synagogues that were burned in Berlin are being levelled by the Jews themselves. We shall build parking lots in their place or new buildings. That ought to be the criterion for the whole country, the Jews shall have to remove the damaged or burned synagogues, and shall have to provide us with ready free space.

 

I deem it necessary to issue a decree forbidding the Jews to enter German theatres, movie houses and circuses.  Have already issued such a decree under the authority of the law of the Chamber for Culture. Considering the present situation of the theatres, I believe we can afford that. Our theatres are overcrowded, we have hardly any room. I am of the opinion that it is not possible to have Jews sitting next to Germans in varieties, movies and theatres. One might consider, later on, to let the Jews have one or two movies houses here in Berlin, where they may see Jewish movies. But in German theatres they have no business anymore. Furthermore, I advocate that the Jews be eliminated from all positions in public life in which they may prove to be provocative. It is still possible today that a Jew shares a compartment in a sleeping car with a German. Therefore, we need a decree by the Reich Ministry for Communications stating that separate compartments for Jews shall be available. In cases where the compartments are filled up, Jews cannot claim a seat. They shall not mix with Germans, and if there is no more room, they shall have to stand in the corridor.

 

Furthermore, there ought to be a decree barring Jews from German beaches and resorts. It’ll also have to be considered if it might not become necessary to forbid the Jews to enter the German forest. In the Grunewald, whole herds of them are running around. It is a constant provocation and we are having incidents all the time. The behaviour of the Jews is so inciting and provocative that brawls are a daily routine. “

 

With such views it is easy to understand that it was Goebbel’s ministry that was responsible for the film “The Eternal Jew”.


Enhanced by Zemanta

Strength Through Joy

Saturday, April 28th, 2012

Strength Through Joy (Kraft durch Freude) was set up in Nazi Germany so that all aspects of a worker’s non-working time were looked after. Strength Through Joy supervised after-work activities, holidays and leisure time. Strength Through Joy served two main purposes. The first was to ensure that no one had too much time on their hands to get involved in untoward activities against the state. There was a belief that idle hands might get involved in anti-state misdemeanours. The second main purpose of Strength Through Joy was to produce an environment within Nazi Germany whereby the average worker would be grateful to the state for providing activities and holidays that in ‘normal’ circumstances they could not afford as individuals.

 

 

Robert Ley was put in charge of Strength Through Joy.

 

 

By 1936, KdF had a membership of 30 million Germans. The scope of the organisation was vast. It arranged theatre trips, summer holidays, skiing holidays, summer and winter hikes, cruises and outdoors activities. People living in the countryside had trains made available for them to get into a city to watch theatre performances. The state provided about as much as could be needed to take up anyone’s slack free time.

 

 

Even exiled opponents of the Nazi regime expressed a veiled recognition of KdF. SOPADE – the Social Democrat Party in Exile – listed everything that the party had to offer in terms of activities including trains that would cover over 100 miles simply to take groups to an activity. However, a report by SOPADE smuggled out of the country in 1936, ended with the chilling sentence: “There is simply no other choice.” This was the issue with KdF – it was effectively compulsory to participate in what it had to offer. Nazi laws did include the vastly sweeping ‘anti-government activity’ legislation and anyone who refused to participate in KdF activities could be classed as being anti-government. A D17 notice would result in any such people being sent to concentration camps as a punishment.

 

 

However, SOPADE also noticed that many Germans living under the Nazi regime actually seemed to accept that what KdF did. ‘Nobody ever bothered about us before’ was a common comment identified by SOPADE members still based in Nazi Germany. In a secret report by SOPADE they clearly made the point that “KdF events have become very popular”.

 

 

The number of people who participated in KdF events was huge. In 1934, 2.1 million people took part in some form of KdF event. By 1937, this had risen to 9.6 million. Between 1936 and 1937, over 1 million hikes were organised. Fascist Italy was one of the few European countries to help out. Cheap skiing holidays were held in the Italian Alps while in the summer around 30,000 people holidayed on the Italian Riviera. Strength Through Joy ships took a lucky few on cruise holidays.

 

 

However, like so many things in Nazi Germany, much of what KdF did was no more than a card trick. In 1936, KdF had a membership of 30 million workers. Yet ‘only’ 7.4 million participated in a KdF trip that year, with nearly 23 million not doing so. A total of 150,000 went on KdF cruises between 1934 and 1939. This was a considerable number but vastly short of the total membership of KdF. Some workers went to holiday camps but while they were there they found that their holidays were regimented and controlled. No one was allowed to do exactly what he or she wanted to do. In a totalitarian state, the government even wanted to control a worker’s holiday. At these camps, the day started with the raising of the swastika flag and ended with the flag being taken down. They had a large number of government spies there who masqueraded as holidaymakers. They listened in to conversations and identified anyone who made what were deemed to be anti-Hitler comments. Huge holiday resorts were promised and one was actually built at Prora on the Baltic coastline. While it was completed, no one ever holidayed there as World War Two broke out just weeks before the complex was due to open.

 

 

Robert Ley constantly reminded the German workers that they should be grateful for what the state, and in essence therefore Hitler, had provided for them. They may have had their trade unions taken away from them but:

 

 

“The worker sees that we are serious about raising his social position. He sees that it is not the so-called ‘educated classes’ whom we send out as representatives of the new German, but himself, the German worker, whom we show to the world.” (Ley)

 

 

Strength Through Joy also set up the scheme for a worker to purchase a car – the People’s Car; the Volkswagen. Hitler himself approved of the Volkswagen and workers were allowed to make monthly payments towards a new car, which were recorded in a savings book. But once again this was a card trick. As war approached, the factories that were meant to produce Volkswagens were turned over to war work and produced the Kübelwagen. No worker ever received a Volkswagen car but such was the entrenchment of the police state – and the fear of a knock on the door – no one was brave enough to complain. Those Volkswagens that were built went to military staff, while the payments made for a new car were invested into the expansion of the military.

 

 

Whether Hitler saw the KdF as a means of bringing all the workers onto his side – socialists and communists had suffered very badly after January 1933 – or as another way of controlling the numerically much larger working class will never be known. Even an anonymous member of the German Freedom Party wrote in May 1939 that the activities offered by the KdF “have their good points” but it was also noted that they served as just another element of controlling the people of Nazi Germany and if you protested against it, you would almost certainly pay the price.


Enhanced by Zemanta

Leni Riefenstahl

Saturday, April 28th, 2012

Leni Riefenstahl found fame in Adolf Hitler’s Nazi Germany. Leni Riefenstahl became Nazi Germany’s most famous film maker. In a state where women played a secondary role to men, Riefenstahl was given a free hand by Hitler to produce propaganda films for the Nazi regime.

Leni Riefenstahl was born in August 1902. She was christened Helene Berta Amalie and she was born into a prosperous family. Her father owned a successful plumbing and engineering firm and he wanted Leni to follow him into the world of business. However, her mother believed that Leni’s future was in show business. At the age of eight, Leni started dancing lessons and she was enrolled into the Berlin Russian Dance School where she quickly became a star pupil. Riefenstahl gained a reputation on Berlin’s dance circuit and she quickly moved into films. She made a series of films for Arnold Fanck, and one of them, “The White Hell of Pitz Palu“, which was co-directed by G W Pabst, saw her fame spread to countries outside of Germany. In 1932, Riefenstahl produced her own work called “The Blue Light“. This film won the Silver Medal at the Venice Film Festival. In the film, Riefenstahl played a peasant girl who protected a glowing mountain grotto. The film attracted the attention of Hitler, who after his appointed to chancellor in January 1933, appointed Riefenstahl to be “Film Expert to the National Socialist Party”.

Hitler is said to have believed that the image Riefenstahl created for herself in “The Blue Light” epitomised the ultimate German woman. 

In 1933, Riefenstahl made a short film about the Nazi Party’s rally of that year. She was asked to make a much grander film of the 1934 event. This led to probably her most famous film – “Triumph of the Will”. The film won awards in both Nazi Germany and Fascist Italy but also, ironically, in 1937, it won the Grand Prix in Paris. The film used camera angles rarely seen before and frequently used shadowy images as opposed to images that were visually clear. The cameramen also did some of their work on roller skates.

Her next major piece of work was to film the 1936 Berlin Olympic Games. Again, this film, called “Olympia”, won many international awards. Her next major project was “Tieland” in which she played a gypsy heroine. Filming took her out of Germany and to Franco’s Spain. By the time the war ended, Riefenstahl had yet to edit the film and it was impounded during the denazification tribunals. After the war, Riefenstahl had many questions to answer.

She was accused of being the visual mouthpiece of the Nazi Party – something she denied. Riefenstahl pointed out that both “Triumph of the Will” and “Olympia” were made by her own independent film company and they were not mere Nazi stooges. She also pointed out the fact that she never been a member of the Nazi Party. 

Riefenstahl also had an enemy at the highest level of the Nazi Party - Joseph Goebbels. His diaries make it clear that she was seen by himself as a competitor for Hitler’s attention as opposed to a team player. She enjoyed such freedom to film because she had support from Hitler – something that Goebbels could not accept.

Immediately after the war, Riefenstahl was arrested and held for a short time at a lunatic asylum. She was rapidly ‘denazified’ in 1945 and not charged with any crime. However, she was forbidden from making films and her films remained banned in post-war Germany for years. This concerned some as Veit Harlan, the maker of “Jew Süss”, a virulently anti-Semitic film made during Hitler’s regime, was allowed to return to film making after the war ended. Some believed that Riefenstahl was forbidden to return to film making simply because she was female – in an industry dominated by men.

Eventually, Riefenstahl did return to film making and photography. She produced underwater films of the Red Sea. In 2002, she became the only person over 100 to release a film – “Underwater Impressions” which was a selection of footage from film clips made by Riefenstahl from the previous thirty years.

“Death does not frighten me. I’ve known so many peaks and troughs – enough for three life times.” Riefenstahl aged 97.

 

“Artistically she is a genius, and politically she is a nitwit.” Liam O’Leary, film historian.

 

“I am one of the millions who thought Hitler had all the answers. We only saw the good things; we did not know about the bad things to come.”“What have I ever done? I never intended harm to anyone. I do not know what I should apologise for. I cannot apologise, for example, for having made the film “Triumph of the Will” – it won the top prize. All my films won prizes.”

Leni Riefenstahl

 

“(Triumph of the Will) was a totally unique and incomparable glorification of the power and beauty of our movement.” Hitler


Enhanced by Zemanta

Hans Frank

Friday, April 27th, 2012

Hans Frank was a seniorNazi official for most of the duration of the Third Reich. Up to the start of World War Two Frank was one of the leading legal figures in the Nazi hierarchy and became the legal advisor to Adolf Hitler. However, it is Hans Frank’s association with the government of part ofPoland during World War Two for which he is most remembered and for which he was executed.

 

Hans Frank was born on May 23rd 1900. His father was a lawyer and it was seen as a natural course for son to follow father into the profession. However, in 1917, Frank served in the German Army duringWorld War One. He was embittered by the peace process and joined the nationalist Freikorps (Free Corps) movement after the end of the war. They fought the communists in Germany to ensure that the ‘red fever’ from the new communist state of Russiadid not engulf the new Weimar Republic. Frank then joined the ultra-nationalist German Workers Party – the original name for the Nazi Party. At this time, the Nazi Party had little support and was short of money. However, it brought him into contact with Hitler as he was one of the earliest card-carrying members of the Nazi Party.

 

Frank continued to study law and he passed his final exams in 1926. He gave the Nazi Party valuable legal advice and Hitler used him as his personal legal advisor. The Great Depression from 1929 to 1933 saw the rise of the Nazi Party to such an extent that Hitler became Chancellor of Germany in January 1933. Frank found himself serving as the legal advisor to the largest political party in Germany.

 

His proximity to Hitler brought him rapid promotion once the Nazis had gained effective control of the Reichstag. In 1933, Frank was made Minister of Justice for Bavaria and was also appointed President of the Academy of German Law in the same year. He wanted all issues dealt with in a proper legal manner so that there could be no recourse in future years. Initially he objected to the murders at Dachau as they were not seen as having gone through the appropriate legal proceedings. He also held the same opinions when it came to theNight of the Long Knives. While the latter clearly had Hitler’s seal of approval, Frank felt safe enough to voice his concern about the lack of legality with regards to the whole event. Hitler justified the killings by saying that for 24 hours he alone was the law in Nazi Germany and therefore the killings were legal. It was not something that Frank is thought to have argued against – Hitler had no qualms about killing an old comrade like Röehm, so Frank’s long time association with Hitler was no guarantee of his personal safety. It is probably no coincidence that Frank went on to say that Hitler’s word had to be considered law.

 

In 1934, Frank was made Minister without Portfolio. This gave him a senior position within the Nazi hierarchy but with no specific department to run. Effectively, he gave advice to men who held high positions within the Nazi Party. But as each man seems to have wanted to create their own power base, it is doubtful if his advice was ever taken on board.

 

World War Two completely changed the part Frank played within the Nazi administration. If after the war he had been tried for his crimes committed between January 1933 and August 1939, it is doubtful that he would have been sentenced to death. But the work he did in Poland condemned him to the hangman’s noose.

 

On September 1st 1939, Nazi Germany invaded Poland. As the first country to suffer the impact of Blitzkrieg, defeat did not take long. Part of Poland was absorbed by Nazi Germany and was seen as being of that country. The Treaty of Versailles had removed part of eastern Germany and handed it to the new Poland. As far as Hitler was concerned, Germany was merely reclaiming land that had been illegally taken from Germany in 1919. However, this was not all of Poland. What was not absorbed into Nazi Germany was known as the General Government – about 50% of the country. This area was handed to Frank to administer and to go with this position he was made an Obergruppenfűhrer in the SS.

 

It was for crimes committed in the General Government that Frank was to pay with his life. Frank oversaw the creation of the ghettoes and the removal of Jews to these ghettoes. He initiated the arrest of the Polish upper class and Polish intellectuals regardless of their religion as he saw them as a potential threat to his authority in the General Government. He used non-Jewish Poles for forced labour. Four of the six extermination camps used during the Holocaust were built in the Greater Government. At the Nuremburg Trials, Frank claimed not to have known about these camps until 1944 but had said in public: “I must ask you to rid yourself of pity. We must annihilate the Jews.”

 

However, he found himself involved in a power struggle with the head of General Government police, Friedrich Krűger, as to who had the final say in the General Government. As Governor General, Frank clearly believed that he had. However, he no longer had the immediate support of Hitler who had been angered by some of the speeches that Frank had made.

 

As the Red Army swept west across Eastern Europe, Frank fled the General Government. On May 3rd 1945, he was arrested by the Americans in southern Bavaria. On two occasions while in custody he tried to commit suicide but failed. For a man who believed in his own innocence, it was a curious and desperate thing to do. He protested that he was innocent of war crimes and crimes against humanity at the Nuremberg Trials – so why attempt suicide twice within two days if this was the case? The evidence against Frank was overwhelming. As an example, it was customary for the Nazis to put up a list of names of those executed within a certain area as a warning to others. Frank had publicly boasted that there were not enough trees in the General Government to cut down to make the paper required to list all of those people he had had killed in his capacity as Governor General.

 

On October 1st 1946 Hans Frank was sentenced to death by hanging. His execution was carried out on October 16th 1946. 


Enhanced by Zemanta

Hitler T-shirts are a Nazi trend for Thai youth

Tuesday, February 28th, 2012

Boutiques in the capital Bangkok have begun selling the garments showing the dictator as a Teletubby, panda or Ronald McDonald.

The tops, costing between £4 and £7.50, have sparked outrage with visitors.

But one vendor tried to justify selling the items — saying they are very popular with the local youth.

The shop owner named only as Hut said: “Some foreigners get upset [when they see the T-shirts on sale] they come to my shop and complain.

“It’s not that I like Hitler. But he looks funny and the shirts are very popular with young people.”

 

Hitler T-shirts on sale in Bangkok

Vile designs … Hitler T-shirts on sale in Bangkok

Tibor Krausz / CNNGO

 

The Israeli ambassador to Thailand is among the T-shirts’ critics. Itzhak Shoham said: “You don’t want to see memories of the Nazi period trivialized in this manner.

“It hurts the feelings of every Jew and every civilized person.”

And the cartoon Hitler is not just limited to clothing. Tacky statues of the tyrant have also appeared in Bangkok’s streets.

Hitler’s evil Nazi regime is estimated to have exterminated six million Jews in the Holocaust.

 

 

Hitler is transformed into a cartoon character and panda

Tasteless images … Hitler is transformed into a cartoon character and panda

Tibor Krausz / CNNGO

 

 

Abraham Cooper, associate dean of the Simon Wiesenthal Centre in Los Angeles, which monitors neo-Nazi activities worldwide, agrees that manifestations of Nazi chic in the region largely come down to sheer ignorance.

But he insisted locals should wise up about Hitler and his harmful ideology. He said: “If the Nazis had won the war, Hitler’s racist ideology would have eventually targeted all races he deemed inferior, including Asians.”

 

Thai youth poses next to a statue of Ronald McDonald as Hitler

Offensive … a Thai youth poses next to a statue of Ronald McDonald as Hitler


Enhanced by Zemanta

Odinist Pagan Runes and Symbols Used by Hitler’s Nazi Germany

Sunday, February 19th, 2012

Nazi Germany

The Hakenkreuz or Swastika as it is better known was the Pagan Germanic symbol of the God of Thunder known as Donnor or Thor. The Hakenkreuz represnts Thor’s hammer.  The Swastika/Hakencruez became the very symbol of all things pertaining to Hitler’s National Socialism, and was used in the design of all sorts of pins, armbands, flags, etc. The symbol  predates Christianity by at least 1,000 years. In Theosphy and Arionosphy it is the very symbol of the Aryan race, which is why Hitler chose it. It is also a religious symbol of Hindus, Jainists, and Buddhists, but is not a Christian symbol.
The Sonnenrad meaning Sunwheel or “Black Sun” swastika was the old Norse representation of the sun. This symbol was adopted by the 5th SS Panzer Division “Wiking”. The pattern was also used on the tiel floor of Himmler’s Wewelsburg Castle, which was the center of his occult/Odinist religion.  It’s a variation of the Swastika. It too is a Pagan symbol that predates Christianity.
The Sig-Rune or Siegrune was symbolic of victory. In 1932 SS man Walter Heck an employee of the badge manufacturer firm of Ferdinand Hoffstatter drew two sig-runes side by side as shown here and it became the symbol of Himmler’s SS.It too is a Pagan symbol that predates Christianity.
The Ger-Rune was symbolic of communal spirit.and was also used as a variant sign of the Waffen-SS division “Nordland”. It too is a Pagan symbol that predates Christianity.
The Wolfsangel or Wolf Hook is the symbol of a wolf trap. While not considered to be ana ctual Rune, it was believed to possess magic  powers to ward off wolves and werewolves. It was adopted by the 2nd SS Panzer Division “Das Reich”.It too is a Pagan symbol that predates Christianity.
This Wolfsangel variant was adopted by the Dutch SS.It too is a Pagan symbol that predates Christianity.
The Opfer-Rune symbolized self sacrifice and was used to commemorate the Nazi Party members killed in the 1923 Munich Putsch.It too is a Pagan symbol that predates Christianity.
The Eif-Rune represented zeal and enthusiasm. It was the early insignia of the specially selected adjutants for Hitler. Here we see it incorporated with the letters “V” and “S” on the membership medallion for members of the N.S-Volkswohlfahrt (Social Welfare). It too is a Pagan symbol that predates Christianity.
The Leben-Rune or Life Rune was adopted by the SS LebensbornSociety which ran the diabolical breeding homes where young unmaried women were impregnated by SS officers in an attempt to create a “Mater Race” of Aryans. It was also used by the “Ahnenerbe”, the Nazi “think tank” that tried to prove that prehistoric and mythological Nordic populations had once ruled the world, as is claimed in Theosophy lore.  It too is a Pagan symbol that predates Christianity.
The Toten-Rune or Death Rune represented death and was used to replace the Christian cross on Waffen-SS graves together with the Leben-Rune to indicate date of birth and date of death. It too is a Pagan symbol that predates Christianity.
The Tyr-Rune In Nazi Germany the Tyr rune was also known as Kampf-Rune (Battle rune) or Pfeil-Rune (Arrow rune) and was symbolic of leadership in battle. It was widely used by various young people organizations after World War I, and later by Hitlerjugend and SA. Worn on the upper left arm, it indicated the graduation from the SA-Reichsführerschule. It was also used as the badge of the SS Recruiting and Training Department, as well as the emblem of the Waffen-SS division “30 Januar”. It is symbolic of Tyr, the Odinist god of war. It too is obviously a Pagan symbol that predates Christianity.
The Heilszeichen or Prosperity symbols appeared on the SS Totenkopfring or Death’s Head Ring awarded by Himmler to selected SS officers.They too are Pagan symbosl that predate Christianity.
The Hagal-Rune was symbolic of faith…but obviously not the Christian faith, since it is a Pagan symbol that predates Christianity. Hagal means “Hail” (Hiel). The use of the Hagall rune in the design of the SS-Ehrenring (SS honor ring, also called deaths head ring) was explained by Himmler as follows: “The swastika and the Hagall-Rune represent our unshakable faith in the ultimate victory of our philosophy.” In Nazi Germany it was also used as an element of the SS wedding ceremony.
The Odal-Rune was used by the Nazis to symbolize  kinship and family and the bringing together of people of similar blood or race. It was adopted by the SS Race and Settlement Office as well as the 7th SS Freiwilligen Gebirgs Division “Prinz Eugen” of Croatia.  In Nazi Germany Odal rune was symbolic of the Blut und Boden (“Blood and Soil”) ideology, focusing on a concept of ethnicity based on descent and homeland.  It was also used by Reichsbauernschaft and Hitlerjugend (Hitler Youth). It too is a Pagan symbol that predates Christianity.
Enhanced by Zemanta

Museum may lose Holocaust artifacts

Saturday, February 18th, 2012

WASHINGTON – In the late 1980s, when organizers of the U.S. Holocaust Memorial Museum were searching for Nazi-era artifacts, they sought to tell a story that was industrial in its magnitude and horrifying in its detail.

 

Little known outside the Holocaust Museum is that many of the objects borrowed from Poland almost a quarter-century ago for the then-new museum were on 20-year loans, and over the past few years, those loans have expired. In some cases, the museum has returned objects, renegotiated loans or exchanged existing materials, such as shoes, suitcases and prayer shawls, for equivalent pieces.

 

Several members of the team that built the exhibition, one of the most visited in Washington, are concerned that the drab wooden barracks from Auschwitz that give visitors a chilling sense of the daily brutality of life under the Nazis may have to be returned to Poland, leaving a prominent hole in what they call the exhibition’s basic narrative.

 

Sara Bloomfield, the museum’s director, said some objects have already been returned or exchanged, but visitors were unlikely to notice any significant change to the exhibition. But she acknowledged negotiations are under way to keep the barracks on the museum’s third floor.

 

“It is our priority to keep the barracks in the exhibition,” Bloomfield said. “We are in negotiations with our Polish partners about how to do that.”

 

If the museum loses important pieces such as the barracks, “the whole veracity of the place will go,” said Martin Smith, a documentary filmmaker who helped craft the exhibition’s focus on narrative. “The physicality of those objects speaks volumes.”

 

Witold Dzielski, first secretary of the Polish Embassy, said he sympathizes with the museum’s desire to keep the barracks.

 

“All the other issues are being solved pretty easily,” he said of the smaller objects that have been returned or exchanged. “But in the case of the barracks, it is a particularly difficult situation. There was an agreement, and according to Polish law, there is no way that the barracks cannot be returned.”

Elie Wiesel, a Holocaust survivor and prominent author, issued a statement encouraging the barracks’ retention.

 

“I fervently hope that the Polish government and the Museum will find a way for the barracks to remain on view,” he wrote. “The museum is of extraordinary importance as it is. There are few institutions in the world that have done for remembrance as well and as much as this museum.”

Enhanced by Zemanta

Hitler painting fetches €32,000 in Slovak auction

Sunday, January 29th, 2012

A 1913 painting by Nazi Germany‘s dictator Adolf Hitler sold for 32,000 euros ($42,300) in a Slovak internet auction on Sunday, the Darte auction house said.

The starting price for the painting titled Maritime Nocturno was set at 10,000 euros, while an expert put its value at 25,000 euros, said Darte, which sold the painting in a closed VIP auction.

The mixed-media painting depicts a full moon over a glittering seascape.

“The painting has been offered for sale by an unnamed family of a Slovak painter who probably met Hitler personally when he was struggling to become an artist in Vienna during the early 20th century,” Darte owner Jaroslav Krajnak said earlier.

“I look at him as an artist — in 1913, when Hitler painted this picture, he didn’t know what would become of him in the decades to come,” he added.

The auctioning house already sold a painting by Hitler from the same family collection last year for 10,200 euros.

Sunday’s auction also offered a painting by Pablo Picasso for 15 million euros.

Enhanced by Zemanta

Auschwitz survivor dies in Oswiecim on anniversary of liberation

Saturday, January 28th, 2012

WARSAW, Poland (AP) — Kazimierz Smolen, a 91-year-old Auschwitz survivor who after World War II became director of the memorial site, died Friday on the 67th anniversary of its liberation. Smolen died in a hospital in Oswiecim, the southern Polish town where Nazi Germany operated Auschwitz-Birkenau during World War II, said Pawel Sawicki, a spokesman for the Auschwitz-Birkenau state museum.

Friday is the anniversary of the camp’s 1945 liberation by Soviet troops. Jan. 27 was designated as International Holocaust Remembrance Day by the United Nations in 2005, and was marked with ceremonies across Europe. Two years after the war ended, Auschwitz-Birkenau became a museum — and Smolen himself served as its director from 1955-1990. He continued to live in the town after his retirement, often attending the memorial ceremonies marking the camp’s liberation.

Sawicki said soon after Smolen’s death the news was announced to Holocaust survivors commemorating the anniversary in Oswiecim. They fell silent for a minute in his honor.

Smolen was born on April 19, 1920, in the southern Polish town of Chorzow Stary. He was a Polish Catholic involved in the anti-Nazi resistance who was arrested by the Germans in April 1941 and taken to Auschwitz in one of the early shipments of prisoners there. He left the camp on the last transport of prisoners evacuated by the Germans on Jan. 18, 1945, nine days before its liberation. He later attributed his survival to good health and extreme luck.

He once explained his decision to return to the camp to manage it as a way of honoring those who were killed there. “Sometimes when I think about it, I feel it may be some kind of sacrifice, some kind of obligation I have for having survived,” he said.

In other gestures of remembrance, Norway’s Prime Minister Jens Stoltenberg apologized for his nation’s role in arresting and deporting Jews after it was invaded by Nazi Germany. During the war, 772 Norwegian Jews and Jewish refugees were deported to Germany. Only 34 survived.

He said it’s time the nation acknowledges that politicians and other Norwegians took part and expressed “our deep regrets that this could have happened on Norwegian soil.” He spoke at a ceremony in Oslo attended by the last surviving Jew in a group of 532 deported from Norway in 1942.

In Turkey, state television on Thursday broadcast the epic French documentary “Shoah,” about the mass murder of Jews under the German Nazi regime. It was the first time the film has been aired on public television in a predominantly Muslim country. “It is a historical event,” filmmaker Claude Lanzmann, 87, said in a telephone interview with The Associated Press from his home in Paris. “It is extremely important that it is being shown in a Muslim country.”

Germany’s Parliament also gathered Friday for a special sitting to remember the Holocaust. Prominent survivor and literary critic Marcel Reich-Ranicki recalled how the Nazi SS informed members of the Warsaw ghetto’s Jewish council in July 1942 of plans for the inhabitants’ “resettlement” to the east.

Reich-Ranicki, 91, recounted how a “deathly silence” was followed by uproar. He said those present “seemed to sense what had happened: that the sentence had been pronounced for the biggest Jewish city in Europe. The death sentence.”

The Nazis set up the Warsaw ghetto in November 1940, cramming hundreds of thousands of Jews into inhuman conditions. Most who survived disease and starvation in the ghetto were transported to death camps.

Enhanced by Zemanta

NH bill would allow service refusal to gay couples

Wednesday, January 25th, 2012

Florists, caterers and other wedding-related businesses could turn away engaged gay couples under legislation before the House that opponents likened to segregation and Nazi Germany‘s race laws.

The House Judiciary Committee held a hearing Tuesday on the bill, which would allow providers of wedding-related goods or services to withhold those services if they believe doing business with gay couples would violate their conscience or religious faith. The bill also would bar lawsuits against business owners in such situations.

Bill sponsor Rep. Jerry Bergevin, R-Manchester, called it a “business protection bill” and said a person’s personal religious beliefs should receive protection in his or her capacity as a service provider.

Noting that New Hampshire protects against discrimination based on both religion and sexual orientation, Bergevin asked, “How do you strike a balance between them?”

State Rep. Cynthia Chase, D-Keene, called the bill “codified discrimination” and the beginning of a “slippery slope.”

“When you begin to codify things for one group, pretty soon it’s OK for that group, and then that group,” Chase said.

Although the bill was presented in reference to gay marriage, opponents said allowing a “person’s conscience or religious faith,” as the bill reads, to determine whom they serve would open the door to discrimination against inter-faith and inter-racial couples, too.

“There are some religions that still believe that African-Americans and Caucasians shouldn’t be able to marry. They would be allowed to discriminate against them under this bill,” said New Hampshire Civil Liberties Union Executive Director Claire Ebel.

New Hampshire’s gay marriage law already exempts churches and religious groups from being forced to officiate gay marriages or provide services, facilities and goods of any kind to participants. The bill would provide the same protections to individuals, which gay marriage opponents sought in 2009.

At the time, then-state Senate Democratic Leader Maggie Hassan of Exeter said she had heard of no legal challenges filed by gays over businesses refusing to provide services for their civil unions in the 17 months civil unions had been legal in New Hampshire. No cases were mentioned in Tuesday’s hearing either.

The committee has not issued a recommendation on the bill. Once they make a recommendation, the bill will move to the full House for a vote.

Another bill facing a vote in the coming weeks would repeal gay marriage and replace it with civil unions of any two adults, including relatives. It would also allow individuals to refuse their services for a civil union‘s’ ceremony and to refuse to treat the civil union as valid if it conflicted with their religious or moral beliefs.

Enhanced by Zemanta