Posts Tagged ‘Netherlands’

Criticism of Dutch “Black Pete” Tradition Grows

Friday, December 7th, 2012

Foreigners visiting the Netherlands in winter are often surprised to see that the Dutch version of St. Nicholas’ helpers have their faces painted black, wear Afro wigs and have thick red lips—in short, a racist caricature of a black person.

The overwhelming majority of Dutch are fiercely devoted to the holiday tradition of “Zwarte Piet”—whose name means “Black Pete”—and insist he’s a harmless fictional figure who doesn’t represent any race. But a growing number are questioning whether “Zwarte Piet” should be given a makeover or banished from the holiday scene, seeing him as a blight on the nation’s image as a bulwark of tolerance.

“There is more opposition to Zwarte Piet than you might think,” says Jessica Silversmith, director of the regional Anti-Discrimination Bureau for Amsterdam. She said that historically her office received only one or two complaints per year, but the number jumped to more than 100 last year, and will escalate much further this year.

“It’s not only Antilleans or Surinamers who are complaining,” she said, referring to people descended from the former Dutch colonies that once traded in slavery. “It’s all kinds of Dutch people.”

There are various versions of the history of St. Nicholas—“Sinterklaas” in Dutch—and of Zwarte Piet, who made his debut as an African servant in an 1850 book.

“Nobody is against the Sinterklaas celebration or is calling people who celebrate it racist,” said Silversmith. “But it is time to consider whether this is offensive, whether there actually are racist ideas underlying Zwarte Piet.”

{snip} Zwarte Piet is frequently defended as part of Dutch cultural heritage, and those who don’t like it are often bluntly invited to leave the country. Many Dutch say Pete’s black face derives from the soot he picked up climbing down chimneys to deliver presents—although that hardly explains the frizzy hair and big lips.

In the U.S., stereotypical black makeup—called blackface—was phased out in the civil-rights era. But in Britain, a TV show featuring blackface lasted until the late 1970s before the practice became taboo. Blackface crops up in other European countries from time to time, such as in a theater performance in Germany this year, but it’s only in the Netherlands that it’s institutionalized in the form of Black Pete.

A sea-change may have occurred here during last year’s festivities, when four men were arrested for wearing T-shirts bearing the slogan “Zwarte Piet is Racism” outside a store during an appearance of Sinterklaas—and charged with protesting without a permit.

For the first time, a white politician has openly challenged the tradition: “The Sinterklaas celebration once began without Zwarte Piet,” Amsterdam councilwoman Andree van Es said in an interview with newspaper Het Parool this week. “It’s time it continues without Zwarte Piet.”

Two major chains of stores, Blokker and V&D, now use images of kids with ash-smudged cheeks in their sales catalogues, rather than Petes with black faces. And in a first this weekend, a documentary laying out arguments against Zwarte Piet aired on national television.

Despite the growing anti-Pete movement, the tradition finds a strong bedrock of support in mainstream Dutch society, meaning it’s unlikely to disappear any time soon.

In 2008, a Museum in Eindhoven called off an anti-Pete exhibition after protests. The foreign artists received death threats. And when Victoria’s Secret model Doutzen Kroes said on national television in 2009 that Zwarte Piet is the one thing that has ever made her feel ashamed of being Dutch, the studio audience laughed at her.

Jan Pronk, a leftist politician who once served as the U.N. envoy to Sudan, dismissed her viewpoint on the show. “These are very old traditions,” he said, “I don’t think it’s so bad.”

One organization reinforcing the Zwarte Piet image is educational broadcaster NTR, which also airs “Sesame Street” in the Netherlands. It has developed a popular fake news program for kids, devoted to the doings of the wise white Sinterklaas and his many bumbling Petes, all with the traditional blackface look.

The program starts in early November and airs nightly until kids open their presents on Dec. 5. (Although the Dutch Sinterklaas is the source of the American Santa Claus, Christmas is a separate holiday in the Netherlands, where the present-opening tradition happens three weeks earlier.) The show draws more than a million viewers in a country of 16 million, and its spokeswoman, Helen Albada, said she was unaware of any complaints about its depiction of Zwarte Piet.

Several years ago, the broadcaster experimented with a story line in which the Petes were turned different colors after sailing through a magical rainbow. That drew thousands of complaints, in part because the backlash against immigration was cresting at the time: Fans said changing Pete was sacrificing Dutch cultural heritage to the forces of multiculturalism.

http://apnews.myway.com/article/20121204/DA2V2FIO2.html

Enhanced by Zemanta

Dutch immigration minister under fire

Friday, August 10th, 2012

Leers talked tough when he took office as Minister of Immigration under the previous minority cabinet. All asylum-seekers whose requests were rejected would be deported as quickly as possible. But it appears now that the minister may have fiddled with the statistics.

An investigation by Dutch current affairs programme Nieuwsuur claims that most of those described as being deported are not refugees. The official number of “forcible deportations” also includes people stopped at the border such as those carrying drugs or without a visa.

“The largest number of so-called deportations,” said migration specialist Han Entzinger, “is in fact of people who have never actually entered the Netherlands.”

Massaging the numbers”
Leers did not take part in the programme but said via a spokesperson that the department’s figures were always collated in this fashion. However, politicians from a number of opposition parties said they were not aware of this and were critical of the minister.

“Leers is massaging the numbers to create the impression he’s deporting as many people as possible,” said Labour Party MP Martijn van Dam.

Detention “inhumane”
The minister is also under fire from other quarters. The Council of Europe, the continent’s advisory body for human rights, has just issued a report highly critical of the treatment of unsuccessful asylum-seekers in the Netherlands.

The Council says the conditions in detention centres are sometimes in conflict with international agreements such as the European Treaty for the Prevention of Torture and Inhuman or Degrading Treatment. This comes hard on the heels of a report by the Dutch Ombudsman describing conditions in detention centres for illegal aliens as “inhumane”.

Unlawful treatment
Around 6,000 people are currently in Dutch detention centres awaiting deportation. This total includes a large proportion of refugees whose asylum requests have been rejected. It is not always possible for these people to return to their countries of origin so they can sometimes be kept in detention for a maximum period of 18 months. It is also not uncommon for those who have been released from detention to be re-arrested and detained once more. The Council of Europe describes these practices as unlawful, saying illegal aliens may only be forcibly detained if there is a realistic prospect of deportation.

The Council is also critical of the treatment of detainees, saying it is worse than that of convicted criminals and of the Dutch practice of detaining families with children.

Last resort
The criticisms echo those of Ombudsman Alex Brenninkmeier who said earlier this week that change was urgently needed in detention centres.  He said detainees should have more freedom of movement, better access to medical care and the opportunity to work or study.

Leers again reacted via a spokesperson, saying detention has always been a last resort and it was up to aliens themselves to avoid it. He said that those willing to co-operate when it comes to their departure will not be forcibly detained.

The criticism from the Council of Europe is particularly unwelcome for the Netherlands which aims to set an example for other countries when it comes to human rights. Dutch governments regularly condemn human rights abuses in countries such as Russia and Turkey which are also members of the Council.

Enhanced by Zemanta

The Mantra

Friday, June 15th, 2012

Everybody says there is this RACE problem. Everybody says this RACE problem will be solved when the third world pours into EVERY white country and ONLY into white countries.
The Netherlands and Belgium are just as crowded as Japan or Taiwan, but nobody says Japan or Taiwan will solve this RACE problem by bringing in millions of third worlders and quote assimilating unquote with them.
Everybody says the final solution to this RACE problem is for EVERY white country and ONLY white countries to “assimilate,” i.e., intermarry, with all those non-whites.
What if I said there was this RACE problem and this RACE problem would be solved only if hundreds of millions of non-blacks were brought into EVERY black country and ONLY into black countries?
How long would it take anyone to realize I’m not talking about a RACE problem. I am talking about the final solution to the BLACK problem?
And how long would it take any sane black man to notice this and what kind of psycho black man wouldn’t object to this?
But if I tell that obvious truth about the ongoing program of genocide against my race, the white race, Liberals and respectable conservatives agree that I am a naziwhowantstokillsixmillionjews.
They say they are anti-racist. What they are is anti-white.
Anti-racist is a code word for anti-white.

Enhanced by Zemanta

The cat-and-mouse game with the Nazis Aachen Justice

Saturday, February 4th, 2012

For years, drives a neo-Nazi group in the Aachen area to mischief. The judiciary seems overwhelmed – but upheld if the privacy of an SS murderer gets hurt.

Rights murders - deployment of the right

On 9 February begins in Eschweiler, near Aachen, a process in which a relatively harmless offense under negotiation: invasion of privacy. Two Dutch television journalists have to answer, because they have a half years ago an old man in a nursing home and visited him while secretly filmed.

Section 201a of the Criminal Code (“violation of the most personal area of ​​life through image capture”) threatening to anyone who “of another person in a dwelling or is to look specially protected area, unauthorized screen shots manufactures or transfers, in violation of their most personal lives” with imprisonment up to one year.

Whether the “victim” will appear as a witness in court is yet to be determined, firstly because he is old and frail, and it also keeps Meanwhile in the hospital ward of a prison on the triple Heinrich Boere, 90, of murder to life in prison.

 

In 1940 he volunteered for the Waffen-SS

 

That is also a convicted murderer rights that he may sue, is beyond question, in this case of course there’s more: namely, why “spurt in offenses which the German judiciary – and not for what crime,” as the magazine “Focus “put it recently, with due caution.

 

SS murderers
PHOTO: PICTURE ALLIANCE / DPA / DPAHeinrich Boere to trial in 2010

Heinrich Boere, born in 1921 in Eschweiler, the son of a Dutch father and German mother, grew up in the Netherlands. In 1940 he volunteered for the Waffen-SS and fought on the Eastern Front before he was assigned to the SS-Sonderkommando “Feldmeijer”, the fully stretched in the course of reprisals “death sentence” in occupied Holland.

After the war, Boere was arrested by a Dutch Special Court and sentenced to death, the sentence later commuted to “life imprisonment”. Could, however, had since been sold to Germany, Boere, in his native town of Eschweiler, where he live more than 30 years and working as a miner, without having to be bothered.

The early ’80s, the Dutch presented a request for extradition, the Justice rejected the German on the grounds that it could not be excluded that Boere was acquired by joining the Waffen SS German citizenshipThen there was an investigation by German authorities, but this was discontinued because it is in the Boere the alleged offenses, according to the prosecution, which had been traded internationally lawful “repressive”.

 

Is there a “Lex Aachen”?

 

Many years later, in summer 2007, the proceedings were resumed. Boere’s defense took great trouble to their clients as “not negotiable” to present, but failed recently at the Federal Constitutional CourtIn March 2010, was convicted Boere the Landgericht Aachen to life imprisonment in December 2011 he took the penalty after an expert had found that he “basically adhesive” would be.

The time between sentence and incarceration Boere used to always tell his story: he was just a cog in a big machine and I have been following orders, the denial would have cost him his own life – just obeying orders.

The prosecutors, who have now filed charges against two Dutch reporter called, in turn, also on a kind of superior orders, the legality principle: If suspected offenses were reported to the police, must be determined.

That too is undoubtedly true. It seems but a “Lex Aachen” to give the prosecution serves as a guide, how vigorously they should proceed in each case.

 

Problems with the “camaraderie Aachen Country”

 

Ten years in the vicinity of Aachen, the NPD was “camaraderie Aachen country”, the “official establishment”, it says on the “CAL” homepage, be carried out in 2002, since then we pursue “political goals with ethnic perspectives .. ., without structure, from Aachen to Düren in undefined boundaries … against the global capitalist system with its symptoms and pseudo-democratic wings! “

Recently we have found in Hamm under the slogan: “Stop the German national death – we can not BRDigen!” carried out a demo: “The demonstration march a good visibility and could march unimpeded had.”

 

Aachen
PHOTO: PICTURE ALLIANCE / DPA / DPAneo-Nazi in the region

In this Annual Report 2010 for North Rhine-Westphalia, the “CAL” thoroughly discussed “particularly active in the public perceived acts in the region Aachen / Düren, the local neo-Nazi scene influential right-wing extremist group ‘camaraderie Aachen country’ … Especially in the first half came in Aachen to increased left-right debate. In this period were recorded in the law enforcement authorities have a range of politically motivated crimes, mostly personal injury and property damage. In cases in which right-wing suspects were identified, these are the environment of ‘camaraderie Aachen Country’ (CAL) are attributed … “

Given such a situation analysis of the Protection of the Constitution, it is somewhat surprising that in the media only a few reports of investigations and is still less than with the proceedings. Remain “politically motivated crimes” largely unpunished, as well as “bodily injury and property damage,” which are the “CAL” attributed?

End of November 2011 reported the WDR in its regional television over the trial of a 25-year-old “KAL” comrades, who had among other things struck in 2008, a policeman with a beer bottle on his head and took part in a raid on a left-wing demonstration.

And these were “only two of a series of offenses” that the relevant laboratory assistant were convicted accused. While he waited for his trial, he went on, trusting that, if convicted, the court recognized a “total punishment”, he would then give volume discounts.

Already in August 2010 Report Munich had reported “nightly raids, threatening phone calls and beatings” in the Aachen region: “More and more people … be displaced by neo-Nazis in fear and terror. “

 

City Council voted unanimously in favor of banning

 

It seems as if playing the neo-Nazis with Aachen Aachen’s justice cat and mouse. According to information from the Press Office of the Prosecutor of Aachen it was “difficult” to pursue the investigation because the “camaraderie Aachen country” is not a registered association. There have been some methods and convictions, but they had no overview at hand.

On 25 January, the Aachen City Council voted unanimously and with the votes of all parties to ban “camaraderie Aachen Country” – almost to the day exactly ten years after the founding of the group. They wanted to send “a clear signal”; more would not have been possible, because only the minister can have the ban an extremist organization.

If so, on 9 February, the two Dutch reporter because of the invasion of privacy need of a triple murderer in court, you will also see spurt in offenses which the German justice – and what not.

Enhanced by Zemanta

German prosecutor launches bid to jail man convicted in Netherlands of Nazi war crimes

Thursday, January 19th, 2012

BERLIN — A Bavarian prosecutor has filed a motion to have a Dutch native who fled to Germany after being convicted in the Netherlands of Nazi war crimes serve his sentence in a German prison — likely the final chapter in decades of efforts to see the 89-year-old jailed.

Klaas Carel Faber — No. 3 on the Simon Wiesenthal Center’s list of most-wanted Nazis — was convicted in 1947 of involvement in 22 murders and for aiding the Netherlands’ Nazi occupiers during World War II. He was handed a death sentence that was later commuted to life in prison, according to Dutch prosecutors.

But in 1952 he escaped and fled to Germany, where he has lived in freedom ever since despite several attempts to try or extradite him.

Efraim Zuroff, the top Nazi hunter at the Wiesenthal Center, applauded the new development in the decades-old case.

“Under the circumstances this is the best we can hope for and it’s a realistic possibility,” Zuroff said in a telephone interview from Jerusalem. “It’s high time that Mr. Faber ends his peaceful and tranquil life in Ingolstadt and is incarcerated for his heinous crimes.”

Faber was saved by his German citizenship when Berlin rejected a request from the Netherlands last year for his extradition on a European arrest warrant — opening the door to pursuing his incarceration in Germany, said Ingolstadt prosecutor Helmut Walter.

Walter said he filed the motion about a week ago with the Ingolstadt state court, but did not know when to expect a ruling.

The court will not need to reconsider any of the facts of the Dutch case, however, he said.

The Dutch court decision in 1947 “is a valid verdict,” he said. “This is purely a legal question — if, through the rejection of the European arrest warrant, the sentence can be enforced here.”

Faber’s telephone number is unlisted and Walter said he has not yet been appointed a defense attorney.

Dutch Justice Ministry spokesman Wiebe Alkema said his government was “happy and satisfied” with the development, which was based on a request from Amsterdam.

“It coincides with what the Netherlands saw as a possible option to get Faber behind bars,” he told the AP.

Faber was born in the Netherlands in 1922 and turns 90 on Friday.

Dutch prosecutors have said he was convicted for killings at three different Dutch locations in 1944-1945, including six at the Westerbork transit camp, where thousands of Dutch Jews, including Anne Frank, were held before being sent to labor camps or death camps in eastern Europe.

According to the Wiesenthal Center, Faber volunteered for Hitler’s SS, a paramilitary organization loyal to Nazi ideology, after Germany overran the Netherlands during World War II.

He also served with the Sicherheitsdienst, the Nazi internal intelligence agency, and an SS unit, code-named Silbertanne, or Silver Fir, which consisted of 15 men, most of them Dutch, who were mustered to exact reprisals for attacks by the Dutch resistance on collaborators, according to the Wiesenthal Center.

Dutch authorities first requested his extradition in 1954 but Faber had been able to get German citizenship because of his service to Germany during the war, so the request was rejected because Germany refused to extradite its own citizens.

In 1957 a Duesseldorf court rejected attempts to bring him to trial in Germany, saying there was not enough evidence against him.

After a Dutch request to have him jailed in Germany in 2004 failed, Munich prosecutors in 2006 received new evidence from the Netherlands and looked into reopening the files. But prosecutors found that the former SS man may have been guilty not of murder but only of manslaughter — and the statute of limitations for that crime had expired.

It was after that — in 2010 — that the Netherlands again asked for his extradition using a new European arrest warrant. It was again rejected, because his consent was still needed to extradite him as a German citizen, but that paved the way for the new appeal to the Ingolstadt court.

 

Enhanced by Zemanta

Johannes Heesters Dead: Nazi-Era Performer Dies At 108

Sunday, December 25th, 2011

Johannes Heesters Dead

BERLIN — Dutch-born entertainer Johannes Heesters, who made his name performing in Adolf Hitler‘s Germany and was dogged later in his long career by controversy over his Nazi-era past, died Saturday, his agent said. He was 108.

The tenor Heesters made his debut on the big stage at the Volksoper in Vienna, Austria in 1934. His career took off in Berlin where, starting in 1935 – two years after the Nazis took power – he became a crowd favorite at the Komische Oper and Admiralspalast.

He gained fame by appearing in films such as “Die Leuchter des Kaisers” (“The Emperor’s Candlesticks”) and “Das Hofkonzert” (“The Court Concert”).

Despite his popularity in the Third Reich, Heesters was never accused of being a propagandist or anything other than an artist willing to perform for the Nazis, and the Allies allowed him to continue his career after the war, when he took Austrian citizenship.

Heesters died early Saturday at the hospital in the southern city of Starnberg, where he had been cared for while being in critical condition for several days, his agent Juergen Ross said.

In Heesters’ native Netherlands – which was occupied by Germany for most of the war – some viewed him as irredeemable given his appearances under the Nazi regime.

In February 2008, he braved protests to perform in the Netherlands for the first time in 44 years at a theater in his native Amersfoort.

In his previous attempt, in 1964, he was booed off the stage in Amsterdam when he tried to appear as the Nazi-hating Captain Von Trapp in “The Sound of Music.”

Heesters said it gave him a “heavy heart” to know he was “not wanted in my homeland.”

“What did I do wrong? Sure, I acted in films in the Third Reich, entertainment films, which distracted countless people inside and outside Germany from daily life during war,” he wrote later about the reception he received.

“Sure, I wanted to make my career and I remember well at the time how many people in the Netherlands were proud that I made a career in the huge neighboring country,” he added. “But apart from my career – and the fact that, through no fault of my own, Adolf Hitler was one of the fans of my art – what have I done?”

Critics focused on a visit Heesters made to the Dachau concentration camp in 1941.

In December 2008, Heesters lost a court attempt to force a German author to retract allegations that he sang for SS troops there.

Heesters maintained he had been ordered to go to Dachau by the Nazis in an attempt to deceive the public about what was really going on there, but said the alleged performance “never happened.”

But Berlin author Volker Kuehn cited an interview with former Dachau inmate Viktor Matejka where the prisoner recalled “I pulled the curtain for him, I was there, I saw him singing.”

Around the time of the court case, Heesters was shown on a Dutch television show saying that Hitler was “a good guy.” His wife, Simone Rethel, immediately intervened, saying that Hitler was the worst criminal in the world.

“I know, doll,” Heesters responded. “But he was nice to me.”

Rethel protested after the clip was aired, telling Dutch papers that he had been tricked into making the remarks, and that the program had cut out other parts of the interview where Heesters condemned the Nazi regime.

Heesters continued to be a popular performer in Germany well into his old age, making regular appearances on television and on stage. He made 1,600 appearances in his best-known role, as Count Danilo in Franz Lehar’s operetta “The Merry Widow,” and 750 as Honore in the musical “Gigi.”

At age 98, he put health problems such as knee and appendix operations behind him to perform in Chekhov’s “The Cherry Orchard.” As he turned 105 in 2008, Heesters was performing in a musical comedy in Hamburg.

“To have nothing to do, to sit there waiting for little aches and pains, is fundamentally wrong,” he once wrote. “Life has to be lived.”

Heesters was born Dec. 5, 1903 in the Dutch city of Amersfoort, the youngest of four sons of a businessman. His first wife, Dutch actress Louisa Ghijs, died in 1983. The couple had two daughters, Wiesje and Nicole.

Heesters married his second wife, German actress Rethel, in 1992.

Enhanced by Zemanta