Posts Tagged ‘Voting’

Black Pastor Uses Lynching Photo to Help Get out the Vote

Sunday, September 16th, 2012

A pastor in Indiana has put up a sign that uses a historical image of the 1930 lynching of two black teenagers in an effort to recharge the black vote.

Rev. Joy Thornton, the senior pastor of Greater St. Mark Missionary Baptist Church in Indianapolis, said he’s concerned that African-Americans have grown complacent about voting, and he wants to urge people to exercise the right he says was hard won, the Associated Press reported.

The sign, which has stood for nearly a week along the street in front of the church, shows, on one side, a white mob gathered around the teens to watch the lynching in Marion, Ind. Atop the photo is the word “VOTE!!!” Beneath it is the question: “Is this a reason to vote?” The other side of the sign shows an image of slaves in chains, with wording beneath it that reads, “Lest we forget.”

“[The sign] is to let people know there’s been a price paid for the privilege of voting,” Thornton, a black pastor of what he describes as a multiracial congregation, told Indianapolis’ WISH TV. “Oftentimes people get complacent and don’t realize that people made a sacrifice, matter of fact, the ultimate sacrifice for such a privilege.”

“Regardless of who you vote for, you need to exercise your privilege, which is voting,” Thornton said.

“I don’t think it [the sign] is as harsh as the fact that when we talk about African-Americans being murdered and killed at an alarming rate,” Thornton said. “It’s not as harsh as the fact we make up about 12 percent of the population and about 90 percent of the incarceration. It is not as harsh as the drugs that we are being exploited within our communities.”

Thornton, who said he’s received two complaints about the sign since it was put up, has no plans to take it down “until the Lord says so.”

Enhanced by Zemanta

Dogs, Dead People Get Voter Forms from Nonprofit

Wednesday, July 18th, 2012

The voter registration form arrived in the mail last month with some key information already filled in: Rosie Charlston’s name was complete, as was her Seattle address.

Problem is, Rosie was a black lab who died in 1998.

A group called the Voter Participation Center has touted the distribution of some 5 million registration forms in recent weeks, targeting Democratic-leaning voting blocs such as unmarried women, blacks, Latinos and young adults.

But residents and election administrators around the country also have reported a series of bizarre and questionable mailings addressed to animals, dead people, noncitizens and people already registered to vote.

Brenda Charlston wasn’t the only person to get documents for her pet: A Virginia man said similar documents arrived for his dead dog, Mozart, while a woman in the state got forms for her cat, Scampers.

The group at the root of the questionable mailings—the Voter Participation Center—acknowledges that the databases it uses to contact possible voters are imperfect because they are developed from commercially collected information. The group also says it expects people who receive misdirected mail to simply throw it away.

Several election officials said they believed the voter registration systems were secure enough to catch people who might improperly submit the misdirected documents, since registrants typically have to furnish ID and election managers use databases—such as death records—to see if someone should be disallowed.

But administrators in New Mexico, a potential swing state in the presidential race, warned that ineligible voters who complete the documents could make it onto the rolls.

New Mexico is one of two states in which noncitizens can qualify for a driver’s license by simply proving residency—not necessarily legal residency—and state elections officials have no way of verifying the legal status of those who file registration documents.

Ken Ortiz, the chief of staff at the New Mexico secretary of state’s office, said some noncitizens have contacted the state asking why they received the forms when they’d previously been told that they could not vote.

The Voter Participation Center works with a vendor that has access to multiple commercial databases that could include people who subscribe to magazines or junk mail using names of their pet, said Page Gardner, the group’s president. She said the nonprofit tries its best to target only eligible and unregistered voters but that some other names inevitably get on the final list.

“Is it a perfect process? No,” Gardner said. Ultimately, she said they rely on the integrity of people and the security of the system and notes that the same forms are available to anyone at county offices or on the Internet.

Enhanced by Zemanta

Statewide Investigation Reveals Dozens of Alleged Illegal Voters

Sunday, July 15th, 2012

 A statewide investigation revealed dozens of allegedly illegal voters.

Secretary of State, Scott Gessler, cross referenced Colorado‘s immigration detainee list with the voter-registration database, and found 85 matches of potential illegal voters.

Using the Open Records Act, Gessler was able to obtain the voting records of those who appear to be registered to vote, but are not US citizens in eight counties, including Mesa.

The findings did not indicate how many of those people were from Mesa County, nor have the identities of those suspected been released.

The controversial report is receiving push-back, however, as some feel voter information should not be available under the Open Records Act, saying that it violates voter anonymity.

Enhanced by Zemanta

Same-sex marriage ban for North Carolina Constitution on ballot

Wednesday, May 9th, 2012

North Carolina’s Amendment One, which would define marriage as strictly between one man and one woman in the state’s constitution, finally goes before voters Tuesday following months of fighting for and against the proposal.

The amendment, which would ban not only gay marriage but also civil unions and domestic partnerships, would add constitutional weight to North Carolina’s existing ban on gay marriages.

A number of conservative and religious groups support of the bill, the most prominent being the Rev. Billy Graham, who was born in North Carolina and lives near Asheville.

“At 93, I never thought we would have to debate the definition of marriage,” Graham’s said in a statement published in full-page ads appearing in 14 newspapers across the state. “The Bible is clear — God’s definition of marriage is between a man and a woman. I want to urge my fellow North Carolinians to vote for the marriage amendment.”

The highest-profile individual standing in opposition to the amendment is former President Clinton. He lent his support to a robo-call initiative directed toward 500,000 voters Monday, paid for by Protect All N.C. Families, which framed the amendment not just as a threat to individual freedoms, but to the state’s economy.

“If it passes, it won’t change North Carolina’s law on marriage,” Clinton said. “What it will change is North Carolina’s ability to keep good businesses, attract new jobs and attract and keep talented entrepreneurs.”

The latest Public Policy Polling survey on Amendment One, conducted between April 20-22, found that although support for the measure has declined since the group’s surveys last year, 54% still favor the amendment, while 40% are against it. Curiously, when asked about whether they would vote for Amendment One if they knew it would lead to a ban of both gay marriage and civil unions, 46% of North Carolinians would vote against it, compared to 38% for.

As just a sample of some of the cash being funneled into the debate around Amendment One, Vote for Marriage N.C., a committee at the forefront of the pro-amendment side, as of April 30 had raised $2.26 million, while the Coalition to Protect N.C. families, which is against the amendment, has raised $2.12 million.

Amendment One, which was referred to a statewide ballot last year by the North Carolina House of Representatives, follows in the wake of 30 state bans on at least same sex marriage, 17 of which also ban civil unions. Florida, Arizona and California were the most recent states to have passed bans, though California’sProposition 8 was recently deemed unconstitutional by the U.S. 9th Circuit Court of Appeals.

Enhanced by Zemanta