Posts Tagged ‘World War II’

The Nazi-Soviet Pact

Thursday, August 2nd, 2012

By the beginning of 1939, Adolf Hitler had become so bold that he tried to steal two separate neighboring territories at the same time. While he was focusing on taking Czechoslovakia, he was also pressuring Poland to give him the former German city of Danzig located on the Baltic Sea. And he wanted the Poles to permit construction of a new super highway and railroad stretching from Germany through Polish territory into East Prussia.

The territory in question was known as the Polish Corridor, a narrow strip of land which gave Poland access to the sea and cut off East Prussia from the rest of Germany. Poland had been granted this sea corridor after World War I by the Treaty of Versailles, which also designated Danzig as a Free City operating under the supervision of the League of Nations.

All of this, of course, was completely unacceptable to Hitler and to most Germans but they never had the power to do anything about it – until now.

April 1939 – Hitler is delighted by the gift of a framed painting from SS-Reichsführer Himmler in honor of his 50th birthday. Reaching the half-century mark had huge personal significance for the Führer – who now wanted his war for Lebensraum sooner rather than later. Below: Nazi elite and assorted guests at Hitler’s birthday reception held at the Hotel Kaiserhof in Berlin.

Making matters worse, Poland’s military leaders had connived with Hitler to steal a small piece of Czechoslovakia back in October 1938. Thus they were more susceptible to being pressured by the Nazis into some kind of agreement concerning Danzig and the Polish Corridor.

To achieve this, Hitler and Nazi Foreign Minister Ribbentrop held several meetings with Poland’s Ambassador to Germany, Josef Lipski, and with the Polish Foreign Minister, Józef Beck. But the Poles said they had absolutely no interest in compromising with Hitler and bluntly informed the Nazis in late November 1938 that any attempt by Germany to grab Danzig “must inevitably lead to conflict.”

Thus far, all of Hitler’s conquests had resulted from his successful use of gangster diplomacy. But now, for the first time in his career, Hitler had encountered an opponent that would not give in. Hitler responded to Poland’s defiance by ordering his generals to prepare to take Danzig “by surprise.”

Meanwhile, Hitler had managed to annex what remained of Czechoslovakia. But it had been a costly move on his part. Outraged public opinion in Great Britain resulted in a tough stance taken by Prime Minister Neville Chamberlain and a firm declaration on March 31, 1939, that Britain, with the backing of France, would fight to save Poland.

Things were not going so easily for Hitler anymore. When he heard about Chamberlain’s guarantee to Poland, he flew into a rage and shouted against the British: “I’ll cook them a stew they’ll choke on!”

That stew would be World War II and was now only a matter of months away. Thus the time had come for the major powers in Europe and elsewhere to pick sides. Britain and France were already aligned with Poland. It could also be assumed that the United States would side with Britain at some future point.

Germany’s main friend in Europe, Fascist Italy, had been strangely silent up to this point. The Italian dictator, Benito Mussolini, had been hemming and hawing for about a year as to whether he would actually take the plunge and formally link his country’s future with Nazi Germany. Mussolini hesitated with good reason. During several visits with top Nazis he had listened to their reckless bragging about the coming war in Europe and Germany’s sure victory.

Mussolini was not at all opposed to the use of military force. However, he preferred to choose his targets carefully, preferably defenseless little countries such as Ethiopia and Albania, both of which he had occupied. But a European war against the major powers was another story. Mussolini’s army was simply not ready for such a war.

The Italians were also taken aback by the Nazis total disregard for the death and suffering a new world war would bring. Mussolini differed greatly from Hitler in that he did not possess the same murderous mentality as the Führer. Hitler did not value human life. Mussolini, although he was a belligerent bully and opportunist, did value life.

Interestingly, Mussolini seems to have made his final decision to ally with Hitler almost on the spur of the moment. On May 6, 1939, Nazi Foreign Minister Ribbentrop met in Milan, Italy, with Mussolini’s son-in-law, Count Galeazzo Ciano, who functioned as Italy’s Foreign Minister. Count Ciano hoped to impress upon the Nazis that Italy wished to delay the onset of war for at least three years. Ribbentrop greatly surprised Ciano by saying that Nazi Germany also wanted to delay things for another three years.

Later that evening, Mussolini telephoned Ciano for a report on the discussions and was informed the talks had gone very well indeed. Upon hearing this, Mussolini instructed his son-in-law to announce to the press that Italy and Germany had concluded an actual military alliance. Ciano then informed Ribbentrop of Mussolini’s remarkable request. Ribbentrop, naturally, had to talk to his Führer before he would agree to anything. He telephoned Hitler who immediately approved the announcement.

Portrait of Count Galeazzo Ciano, the gullible son-in-law of Mussolini, who inadvertently paved the way for the Nazi military pact with Fascist Italy.

Tragically for Italy, Mussolini and his son-in-law had completely misjudged the whole situation. By this time, Hitler had already issued secret orders to his generals to be ready to invade Poland by September 1st. The Germans were deliberately keeping the Italians in the dark as to their true intentions. The military “Pact of Steel” subsequently signed by Italy and Germany would later have disastrous consequences for the Italian people as they were drawn into Hitler’s war.

While all of these developments were occurring, Soviet Russia was feeling quite left out of the whole diplomatic scenario. The Russians voiced their dissatisfaction in a series of speeches originating from Moscow but geared toward Western ears. In March 1939, Soviet leader Josef Stalin gave a cynical speech describing the Munich Agreement and subsequent concessions made by Britain as an attempt to push Germany further eastward, perhaps into a war with Russia. Stalin warned the Western Allies that he would not allow Soviet Russia to be manipulated into a solo war against Nazi Germany while the West just stood by and watched.

In May 1939, Soviet Foreign Minister Vyacheslav Molotov gave a speech hinting that the Western Allies should get busy and talk to Moscow soon or there might be some kind of agreement forthcoming between Soviet Russia and Nazi Germany.

However, Prime Minister Chamberlain, leader of the Western Allies, was in no hurry to talk to the Russians. He simply did not believe in the value of a military alliance with Soviet Russia. In a private letter he even asserted: “I have no belief whatever in her ability to maintain an effective offensive, even if she wanted to. And I distrust her motives…”

Chamberlain was not alone in his distrust. The Poles actually hated the Russians, knowing that Stalin would not hesitate to gobble up Poland if he had the chance. As a result, Poland, along with Britain, had thus far refused all Russian offers to discuss joint military action in the event of further Nazi aggression. This outright rejection encouraged Stalin to negotiate with the Nazis.

Although Hitler had repeatedly professed his own hatred of Bolshevism (Communism in Soviet Russia), he decided to pursue a non-aggression pact with Stalin to avoid the possibility of having to fight a war on two fronts at the same time.

Hitler’s master plan was to crush Poland with lightning speed, then turn westward and knock out France and Britain. It was therefore necessary for Soviet Russia to remain neutral, otherwise Germany might have to fight the French-British in the west and Russians in the east – the dreaded military scenario that had proved so disastrous for Germany two decades earlier during World War I.

This time around, the Western Allies would be knocked out first, then Hitler would turn his armies eastward and plunge deep into Russia, rolling over Stalin’s Red Army to acquire thousands of miles of Lebensraum at Russia’s expense.

Hitler, just like the Western Allies, had a low opinion of the Red Army’s fighting potential and also grossly underestimated Josef Stalin, one of the most ruthless humans who ever lived.

Stalin, like Hitler, did not value human life. By this time in Soviet Russia’s history, Stalin had experience in committing mass murder and had his own well-developed system of concentration camps. Stalin would kill anyone for any reason. The slightest suspicion, real or imagined, was enough to make a person vanish without a trace inside the Soviet terror state he created.

But now, through a quirk of fate, Stalin suddenly became the man of the hour in Europe. When the British finally realized there was a good possibility he might side with the Nazis, they put aside their own reservations about the man and pursued an alliance.

A beaming Josef Stalin (rear right) along with Foreign Minister Molotov (beside him) watches Nazi Foreign Minister Ribbentrop sign the Non-Aggression Pact for Germany. Below: Symbolic Russian-German handshake by Stalin and Ribbentrop after the signing.

When the Nazis realized the British were seeking an alliance, they intensified their own efforts. Thus, as the summer of 1939 arrived, a strange kind of competition sprang up between the British and the Germans as to who would succeed in getting the Russian leader to sign on the dotted line.

The biggest hurdle facing the British was that Poland refused outright to allow any Russian troops onto its soil under any conditions, even if the country was being invaded by Hitler. This, of course, made it nearly impossible to conclude a military pact involving Russia.

In addition to this, Chamberlain made a series of diplomatic blunders that allowed Hitler and Ribbentrop to gain momentum. Chamberlain’s negotiators didn’t even arrive in Moscow until August 11th. By that time, the Nazis had been hard at work laying the groundwork for a Nazi-Soviet pact.

Worse for the British, the Russians were insulted that Chamberlain sent second-rank British military officers to Moscow on such an important mission. Chamberlain also instructed his negotiators not to rush into anything at first, thus they moved at a snail’s pace during the initial discussions, frustrating the Russians. The British also declined to share any military intelligence with the Russians, further insulting them.

All of these complications served to convince Stalin that Poland and its Western Allies were not serious about seeking a military alliance against Hitler.

Stalin had no qualms about negotiating with Hitler, if it was in the best interest of Soviet Russia to do so. Hitler, of course, had every reason to negotiate with Stalin. It was now mid-August and his planned invasion of Poland was just a few weeks away.

Germany’s ambassador in Moscow, Count Schulenburg, pushed hard to get the whole process rolling and was authorized by Berlin to say yes to every Russian demand. The Russians responded kindly to this and on August 16th sent the first word back to Berlin that a non-aggression pact might indeed be forthcoming. They even took the time to provide a first draft of just such a pact.

As the days of August ticked by and September grew ever-closer, Hitler and Ribbentrop became frantically determined to get the pact finalized and signed. On August 20th, Hitler sent a personal message to Stalin stating that “a crisis may arise any day” between Germany and Poland and therefore the Russian leader should receive Ribbentrop in Moscow “at the latest on Wednesday, August 23rd.”

Once again the Russians responded kindly and agreed to see Ribbentrop on the 23rd to seal the actual agreement. The two Foreign Ministers, Ribbentrop and Molotov, thus signed the Nazi-Soviet Non-Aggression Pact in a ceremony at the Kremlin building attended by Stalin himself.

Hitler had gotten what he needed. He would not have to fight a war on two fronts. And Stalin got what he wanted. According to a secret protocol attached to the pact, Stalin was granted a free hand in Eastern Europe to steal back several areas lost to Russia at the end of World War I, including the countries of Latvia, Estonia and Finland, the province of Bessarabia in Romania, and most importantly, the entire eastern portion of Poland.

Hitler was quite willing to be this generous to Stalin, knowing all along that he intended to destroy Soviet Russia itself in the not-too-distant future.

The Nazi-Soviet Pact sealed the fate of Poland, a country that was geographically isolated from its Western Allies, thus making direct military aid nearly impossible. Poland’s only hope for survival would have been an alliance with its next door neighbor, the Russians.

The news that these two cynical, ruthless men, Adolf Hitler and Josef Stalin, had made a pact with each other, shocked the world. Everyone knew what it meant – that a new world war was all but certain now. All that remained was for the Führer to say when.

Enhanced by Zemanta

Cities Where Homes Cost Less than a Car

Tuesday, July 24th, 2012

For many Americans, homeownership is the epitome of living the American dream. Yet, in towns with high tumbling home prices and double-digit vacancy rates, median-priced homes now cost the equivalent of new American cars—except, as investments go, they’re slightly more risky.

This quandary is especially meaningful to residents of Motor City, who have experienced deepening levels of housing hell in recent years. Much has been written about Detroit’s high misery index, and the challenges of thriving in a city with high unemployment, high crime rates, and city services under severe budgetary constraints. And yet, for those willing to take a long view of the city, Detroit also offers amazing bargains to residents dedicated to living in that community.

These are the cities where homes cost less than a car:

1. Detroit

2. Flint, Mich.

  •  Median listing price: $31,950
  •  Comparably priced car: Chrysler 300 ($31,950)
  •  Housing price change (year over year): n/a
  •  Median household income: $28,835
  •  Unemployment: 8.9 percent

According to Trulia’s Kolko, both Flint and Detroit experienced significant housing-price declines, not because of overbuilding as in Florida but because of “long-term job decline coupled with declining populations.” Worse, Flint suffers from a significant amount of poverty with about 44 percent of the population earning less than $25,000 a year, according to Census economic data.

3. Gary, Ind.

  •  Median listing price: $39,900
  •  Comparably priced car: Ford Expedition ($39,900)
  •  Housing price change (year over year):—7.5 percent
  •  Median household income: $27,367
  •  Unemployment: 8.5 percent

4. Redford, Mich.

  •  Median listing price: $40,000
  •  Comparably priced car: Ford F-450 ($55,000)
  •  Housing price change (year over year): 5.2 percent
  •  Median household income: $52,573
  •  Unemployment: 9.9 percent

Redford is not a large city, but it suffers from problems such as 1-in-159 homes in foreclosure, the worst rate among cities on this list. It also has aging homes, most of which were built just after World War II and may be expensive to maintain. Like Warren, prices have dropped by 38.5 percent from their peak according to FHFA data. On the bright side, at $52,573 the average annual income in Redford is higher than in many of its neighboring cities on this list.

5. Warren, Mich.

  •  Median listing price: $49,900
  •  Comparably priced car: Lincoln Navigator ($59,900)
  •  Housing price change (year over year): 6.5 percent
  •  Median household income: $46,247
  •  Unemployment: 9.9 percent
Enhanced by Zemanta

Estonia fends off Russian accusations of ‘Nazi glorification’

Friday, July 20th, 2012

Russia said that the gathering last weekend in Saaremaa was “aimed at glorification of former SS-men and local collaborationists”. According to Moscow, the event could be interpreted in “no other way than intentional propagation of pro-Nazi attitude in Estonian society”.

In a statement, a spokesperson of the Russian Foreign Ministry also called the gathering “undisguised jeering at the memory of those who saved the world from ‘brown plague’ at the expense of their own lives.”

Estonian Defence Minister Urmas Reinsalu denied in a written statement to EurActiv that the event was a glorification of fascism. A European Commission official said the EU executive would study the situation before reacting.

Russia, which lost 20 million people in World War II, is particularly sensitive to attempts to present all war veterans in the same category. Moscow also keeps Estonia, a former Soviet republic, under close watch (see background).

Russia seems particularly that the Reinsalu delivered a speech at the veterans’ event.

“His expression of gratitude to fascism vassals for ‘saving the honour of Estonian people’ is evidence of ‘mythopoetry’ of the official Tallinn in relation to World War II events,” the Russian spokesperson stated.

Russian media report that among those present were the veterans of the 20th Waffen SS division and other Estonians who fought on the Nazi side in WWII against Soviet occupation of the country.

The Estonian Anti-Fascist Committee, an NGO, accused Reinsalu of “demonstrating to the whole world that Nazi ideology can be justified and those who followed Hitler’s orders can become national heroes”.

Europe turning a blind eye?

“The reason for such negligence to the norms of law and morals is based on only one thing – the higher echelons of power in the European Union are turning a blind eye to neo-Nazi sentiments and refuse to pay attention to the falsification of history and the making of Nazi criminals in Europe into heroes,” the Anti-Fascist Committee stated, quoted by the Russian TV channel RT.

Asked by EurActiv to comment on the accusations, Reinsalu said in a written answer that the Estonian Parliament recognised “the merits of those who fought in the name of Estonia’s independence”.

On the other hand, he insisted that the Parliament had “unequivocally” condemned the crimes against humanity perpetrated during the Soviet and National Socialist German occupations, “regardless of the citizenship of the perpetrator or where the crimes were carried out”.

The minister further wrote that “the gathering of the Association of Estonian Freedom Fighters held in Saaremaa last week was a civic initiative event to commemorate those who fought for Estonia’s freedom as well as the victims of the occupation regimes. Accusations that depict events held to commemorate the victims of totalitarian regimes as manifestations of neo-Nazism are erroneous and deeply offensive.”

He insisted that his country consistently condemned the crimes of all the totalitarian regimes that occupied Estonia – Nazism and Stalinism – and denounced “all attempts to distort this message”.

Enhanced by Zemanta

Nazi war crime compensation ruling upheld

Friday, June 1st, 2012

Italy‘s highest court upheld an International Court of Justice ruling that Germany does not have to compensate Italian victims of Nazi war crimes.

The international court, based in The Hague, Netherlands, had determined in February that Italy “failed to recognize the immunity recognized by international law” for the crimes, the Italian news agency ANSA reported.

The Italian Supreme Court decision was the first in which it upheld a ruling from the international court on the Nazi war crimes compensation issue.

The Hague court found Germany was immune from being sued in foreign courts by victims of crimes committed during World War II and ordered compensation orders be voided.

Germany appealed to the international court in 2008 following two Italian court decisions that ordered Berlin to pay compensation to 12 Italians who were taken prisoner by Nazi forces and deported to Germany for slave labor after dictator Benito Mussolini fell from power and Italy abandoned its former ally in September 1943.

In both cases, the Italian judges had rejected Germany’s claims that it was exempt from financial responsibility for crimes committed by Nazi soldiers under accords drawn up in 1947 and 1961.

Enhanced by Zemanta

67-year-old Vietnam Vet harrassed by ghetto youth on bus

Monday, May 28th, 2012

67-year-old Vietnam Vet harrassed by ghetto youth on bus

   

Enhanced by Zemanta

Waffen SS

Monday, May 28th, 2012
Enhanced by Zemanta

Luftwaffe M40 Helmet

Tuesday, May 15th, 2012

In 1940 a new version of Stahlhelm was produced, the Model 1940. The Model 1940 was almost identical to the model 1935 in every way except that the tri-color shield was removed along with the Wehrmactadler. The M40′s ventilation holes on the sides of the helmet were also increased for maximum combat and production efficiency. The crimping of the rim of the Model 1935 was still in use for this Stahlhelm variation.

Enhanced by Zemanta

German Secret Weapons

Monday, May 14th, 2012

Jet and rocket aircraft

 

  • Arado 234 - the world’s first jet bomber, the Arado 234 was a highly advanced single-seat bomber with automatic pilot, eject seat, pilot-aimed rear guns, and with its two jet engines and streamlined shape it was too fast to intercept. 
  • Messerschmitt 262 - the world’s first jet fighter, it was an excellent bomber interceptor. ( read full Messerschmitt 262 essay ). 
  • Messerschmitt 163 - the world’s first rocket-powered fighter, the Messerschmitt 163 was an incredibly fast AND highly agile short range point defense bomber interceptor, like a manned and reusable anti aircraft missile. Once the incoming bombers formation appeared, it could take off, climb at them at an incredible rate, close in at 600mph, a speed that made the heavy bombers and their escort fighters almost sitting ducks in comparison, attack, then disengage, run out of rocket fuel, dive down unpowered but still too fast for any other fighter to chase, and then easily glide back to landing at base. In the hands of a capable pilot it was a formidable weapon, even if short ranged, and indeed one German ace once shot down three B-17 bombers one after the other in one sortie with it. 
  • Heinkel 162 - a jet fighter designed to be mass-produced by minimally trained workers, using available non-strategic materials, and to be flown by minimally trained pilots. Just 69 days after being given the contract, Heinkel successfully flew the new jet fighter, and production started.

Other advanced aircraft

 

  • Dornier 335 - the world’s first fighter with eject seat, the Dornier 335 was a fast and powerful bomber interceptor which could fly and climb faster than its opponents, the American P-51 Mustangescort fighters. Unlike typical twin-engine aircraft with one propeller on each wing, the Dornier 335 had one propeller in the nose and one propeller in the tail. 
  • Junkers 87 “Stuka” - the world’s first real precision bomber, the Stuka played key role in the German Blitzkrieg victories in the first half of the war, and remained the best dive bomber of World War 2. ( read full Stuka Dive Bomber essay ). 
  • Helicopters - the world’s first operational military helicopters were the Flettner 282, a small maritime reconnaissance helicopter used mostly in the Mediterranean, and the Focke Achgelis 223, a utility helicopter. Production numbers were low due to the destruction of the factories by Allied air bombardment.
Enhanced by Zemanta

Speaker Express Information

Saturday, May 12th, 2012

The great military successes on all fronts have led part of the population to have an overly optimistic opinion of the situation, one that is ahead of the facts. The [German] people’s desire for peace can lead only too easily to wishful thinking that does not correspond to actual conditions. Thus one not infrequently encounters the following thinking by average citizens:

In the East, the Soviet Union is near its end since the Caucasus has been cut off and the Volga River has been reached. The English can no longer do anything to us in the Mediterranean; if U-Boat successes continue for a few months longer, the opponents will no longer have any shipping capacity. They suffer one defeat after another in East Asia. And British dominion over India is almost ready to collapse. All these factors together mean that the war will end victoriously for us this year.

Such a very optimistic attitude is extraordinarily dangerous. If it is not dealt with or derailed, the danger exists that there will be serious effects on morale that will hinder dealing with the increased difficulties that will come with winter.

In our speeches we must avoid anything that might encourage such overly optimistic wishful thinking by the public.

Any predictions about future developments are absolutely forbidden. The task of propaganda is not to predict what will happen, but rather to explain what did happen and is happening. This also includes raising certain hopes about a future significant improvement in our food situation resulting from harvests in the newly won regions of the Soviet Union.

Even if we succeed in producing agricultural surpluses in these areas in the face of great difficulties such as the lack of agricultural machinery, tractors, fuel, seed, etc., it will not be immediately possible to transport large amounts of these products to the Reich. Any predictions in this subject are absolutely out of order. Even if the food situation improves significantly in the near future, from the propaganda standpoint it is better to announce the success after the fact. Here, too, the maxim applies: â€œNothing is as successful as success, and nothing is more dangerous than disappointed hopes.”

It is always important to even with great successes that each success is only a building block of victory. Our opponents have taken very heavy blows and their losses are terrible, but they are not yet fatally wounded. A boxing match provides a good example:

One boxer has been hit hard and could collapse at any moment. Then the bell rings and the pause enables him to catch his breath again and gather new strength. One round follows another until finally continuing blows break his last strength and he suddenly falls to a blow, often one weaker than those he has already withstood.

All speakers have the absolute duty of following the above guidelines. We want to train our people to hardness, and must therefore avoid strengthening any overly optimistic hopes that are expected to be fulfilled within a short time. We must much more make it clear to our people that there is no doubt of our final victory, but that a major and critical decision will not happen in the immediate future. Instead, we must slowly beat down our opponents step by step.

Enhanced by Zemanta

Second ‘Underwear Bomber,’ Kim Philby, and Other Notorious Double Agents

Friday, May 11th, 2012

The quintessential turncoat, Benedict Arnold actually was quite the patriot at the beginning of the Revolutionary War. He had been involved in many victories over the British, but frequently was overlooked for advancement and honors. After another general claimed responsibility for his success at the Battle of Saratoga in 1777, Arnold grew disillusioned. His wife had died during his endless campaigns, he was broke, and Congress kept cutting funding for the military. Around this time, he was reprimanded, unfairly, on two counts of dereliction of duty. Soon after he wrote to British Major John Andre and made a deal to sell his command of West Point to the British for 20,000 pounds ($3 million in today’s dollars). Andre was intercepted with the plan and hanged.Arnold escaped and accepted a commission with the British Army, leading attacks on Virginia and Connecticut, before moving to London. He died in 1801. 

 

Timothy Webster, a British-born former New York City police officer, was hired by Allan Pinkerton, who called himself the “Chief of the United States Secret Service,” and sent to Richmond to do reconnaissance work in the Confederate capital. His cover was that he was a secessionist courier from Baltimore. According to Pinkerton, everyone who met Webster, “yielded to the magic of his blandishments and was disposed to serve him whenever possible.” He quickly ingratiated himself with Confederate officials, including Secretary of War Judah P. Benjamin, who asked him to start carrying messages to secessionists in Baltimore. This allowed him to deliver actual Confederate documents to Pinkerton, along with his observations. In 1862, captured Pinkerton operatives blew Webster’s cover. He was arrested, tried, and hanged, despite a letter from Abraham Lincoln to Confederate President Jefferson Davis asking that Webster’s life be spared.

Mata Hari

Born Margaretha Geertruida Zelle in Holland in 1876, Mata Hari moved to Paris in 1905 and became famous for her Asian-inspired exotic dancing. She had learned something of Indian and Javanese dancing styles when she had lived in Malaysia with her husband, who was in the Dutch Colonial Army. Her fame grew and she acquired lovers throughout Europe, many of them very powerful. After the outbreak of World War I in 1914, the German consul in Holland tried to recruit her as a spy. She took his offer of 20,000 francs, though it seems she never actually did any spying for him. The French soon asked her to spy for them as well, but they quickly learned that she was technically in the employ of the Germans. She was arrested in 1917, tried, found guilty, and executed on October 15. However, the case against her was flimsy and much of the evidence against her was circumstantial. Thirty years later, one of the prosecutors declared, “There wasn’t enough evidence to flog a cat.”

Dusko Popov

The man who inspired James Bond, Yugoslavian Dusko Popov was recruited by MI5 to work as a double agent during World War II— between 1940 and 1944. He pretended to give the Germans important military intelligence, when he was really relaying information about Germany back to the British. He communicated invisible ink on postcards, and a special code of microdots. Unfortunately, his code name was not quite as cool as 007’s. At first he was called Agent Scoot. But his “appreciation for the ladies” and his love of threesomes earned him the name Agent Tricycle.


notorious-double-agents-tease
 

Arthur Owens

Arthur Owens spent years in exile, reviled as a Nazi spy, but he actually was a double agent working with MI5. The Germans recruited Owens, a broke inventor and Welsh nationalist, while he was on a business trip to Belgium in 1935. He did give the Germans important information about the British military buildup before the war. But he was quickly recruited by MI5 to work as the Britain’s first double agent. In 1941, he was placed in Dartmoor prison, where he took information from German inmates and fed it back to his bosses. Documents released in the 1970s revealed his dual role, but unfortunately, they did not have a widespread impact and did nothing to improve his reputation as a traitor.

Harold ‘Kim’ Philby

Harold “Kim” Philby was one of 40 Cambridge students recruited to work as spies by the Soviet Union, but he rose far higher, was more trusted, and lasted longer than the rest. He started as a KGB informer in the 1930s in London, while working as a London Times correspondent. In the 1940s, he joined the Secret Intelligence Service, became one of its most trusted agents, and worked as a mole for the Soviet Union for nearly eight years. He even received the Order of the British Empire in 1945. In 1949, he started working as a British Intelligence liaison between the FBI and the CIA. Philby finally came under suspicion in 1951, but was not caught outright until January 1962, because his bosses refused to believe evidence against him. Three days after being accused of espionage, he fled to the Soviet Union where he died in 1988.

 

Enhanced by Zemanta